Need help with keplers 3rd law of periods problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter brett812718
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving a problem related to Kepler's Third Law of Periods, specifically for a satellite orbiting a planet. The satellite has a mass of 20 kg, an orbital period of 2.6 hours, and a radius of 9.4E6 m. The gravitational acceleration on the planet's surface is given as 8.6 m/s². The key equations used are T² = (4π²/GM)r³ for orbital period and a = GM/r² for gravitational acceleration. The user encountered difficulties in calculating the planet's radius, indicating a misunderstanding of the variables in the equations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Kepler's Third Law of Periods
  • Familiarity with gravitational equations
  • Basic knowledge of circular motion and orbital mechanics
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the derivation of Kepler's Third Law of Periods
  • Study the relationship between gravitational force and orbital radius
  • Practice solving problems involving gravitational acceleration and mass
  • Learn how to differentiate between variables in physics equations
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on orbital mechanics and gravitational theory, as well as educators looking for problem-solving strategies related to Kepler's laws.

brett812718
Messages
57
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] need help with keplers 3rd law of periods problem

Homework Statement


A 20 kg satellite has a circular orbit with a period of 2.6 h and a radius of 9.4E6 m around a planet of unknown mass. If the magnitude of the gravitational acceleration on the surface of the planet is 8.6 m/s2, what is the radius of the planet?



Homework Equations


T^2=((4pi^2)/(GM))r^3

a gravity=(GM)/r^2


The Attempt at a Solution



I used the law of periods to find the mass and then used the second equation to find the radius of the planet but I got a really small number
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you show your calculations in more detail? Note that r in your first equation is not the same as r in the second (in case you forgot that).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K