awholenumber
- 200
- 10
I wish i had one book or pdf to learn about different types of fractions .
Please help
Please help
The discussion revolves around finding resources to learn about different types of fractions, including their classifications and operations. Participants share various materials, websites, and personal insights regarding the understanding and teaching of fractions.
Participants express differing opinions on the usefulness of traditional classifications of fractions, with some advocating for their elimination while others defend their relevance. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the necessity and utility of these classifications.
Some participants highlight the potential confusion arising from notation and classification of fractions, indicating that these issues may depend on individual learning preferences and contexts.
Individuals seeking to improve their understanding of fractions, educators looking for teaching resources, and students needing assistance with arithmetic concepts may find this discussion beneficial.
The way I remember it is that in an improper fraction, the numerator is greater than or equal to the denominator, so 3/2 would be an improper fraction. A number like 1 1/2 is called a mixed number. I agree that mixed numbers really have no place in mathematics.fresh_42 said:As a consequence, the classification "improper" is nonsense.
About all you need to know about fractions is covered in @fresh_42's post #4: i.e., how to add, subtract, multiply, and divide fractions. Don't overthink this.rosekidcute said:Other than that book , i have not come across any quality materials on fractions
Yes, that's also what is said in the OP's link. But what is it good for? I consider it ballast. I cannot imagine a case where it is necessary to name quotients ##\frac{4}{5}## and ##\frac{5}{4}## differently. It seems only to be necessary if one wants to write the improper ones as "mixed numbers". But in the end it's an opinion. Dropping a "+" sign in a framework which usually drops "##\cdot ##" is questionable at least, proper and improper ... whomever it fits. It wouldn't be my first choice when learning about fractions.Mark44 said:The way I remember it is that in an improper fraction, the numerator is greater than or equal to the denominator, so 3/2 would be an improper fraction.
I agree completely.fresh_42 said:Yes, that's also what is said in the OP's link. But what is it good for? I consider it ballast.
The only place where this concept comes into play again is in Partial Fraction Decomposition, which could be used in this integral: ##\int \frac{x^2}{x^2 - 1}##. Here the integrand is an improper rational function. Writing the integrand as ##\frac A {x^2 - 1} + \frac B {x^2 - 1}## won't work, but using polynomial division or a clever trick, one could write the integral as ##\int [1 + \frac 1 {x^2 - 1}]dx##, and then break this into two integrals and use partial fractions or a trig substitution on the last part.fresh_42 said:I cannot imagine a case where it is necessary to name quotients ##\frac{4}{5}## and ##\frac{5}{4}## differently. It seems only to be necessary if one wants to write the improper ones as "mixed numbers". But in the end it's an opinion. Dropping a "+" sign in a framework which usually drops "##\cdot ##" is questionable at least, proper and improper ... whomever it fits. It wouldn't be my first choice when learning about fractions.
If there any such books, they must be very thin; there's not very much to say about fractions. Any book on arithmetic should have a section on fractions.rosekidcute said:I wish i had one book or pdf to learn about different types of fractions .