Need method to open/close a 4" vertical tube to adjust spillover level

  • Thread starter Thread starter Qmavam
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around methods to open and close a 4" vertical tube to adjust the spillover level in a system, focusing on design solutions, material compatibility, and mechanical mechanisms. Participants explore various approaches, including the use of sleeves, tubes, and valves, while considering the operational conditions such as temperature and flow dynamics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose using an elastic rubber sleeve on the outside of the tube to selectively block holes by sliding it up or down.
  • Others suggest a harder plastic sleeve that could slide inside the tube, although concerns about fit and sealing are raised.
  • One participant introduces the idea of a hollow tube with O-rings to seal above and below the overflow holes, allowing for adjustable height without needing drilled holes.
  • A piston ring compressor is mentioned as a potential solution, with considerations about its design and functionality in relation to the system's requirements.
  • Concerns about the temperature compatibility of materials are highlighted, particularly regarding the use of elastomeric polyvinyl chloride at 90°C.
  • Some participants discuss the possibility of redesigning the overflow mechanism to default to a closed state, suggesting that this might simplify the overall design.
  • Alternative ideas include using a variable velocity pump or a telescoping inner tube to adjust flow levels, with discussions on the complexity of implementation.
  • One participant mentions the potential for reducing the annular volume between tubes to control treatment time without additional mechanisms.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a variety of ideas and approaches, with no clear consensus on a single solution. Multiple competing views remain regarding the best method to achieve the desired spillover adjustment.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations related to material properties, temperature constraints, and the need for conductive components in the design. There are also unresolved considerations regarding the mechanical complexity of proposed solutions.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in mechanical engineering, fluid dynamics, or system design may find the discussion relevant, particularly those working on similar projects involving flow control mechanisms.

Qmavam
Messages
16
Reaction score
3
TL;DR
I have a 4" vertical thin wall aluminum spillover tube, I want the spill over tube to have two adjustments besides the full height. There is not a lot of room to make these adjustments, but probably just enough depending on solution. I have include some relevant info in the drawing. My first idea is to have internally threaded inserts heli-arced around the circumference of the 4" tube, and put threaded plugs in the holes.
Thanks, Mike
Vessel 8in 4in Feasible solutions to adjustable levels.png
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

Consider an elastic rubber sleeve that can be positioned on the outside of the 4" tube. To selectively block holes, slide it up or down.

An alternative would be a harder plastic sleeve that slides inside the 4" tube.
 
Baluncore said:
Consider an elastic rubber sleeve that can be positioned on the outside of the 4" tube.
Such a sleeve can be found at many hardware stores. This image is from Amazon for a 4" sleeve:
Flex pipe connector.jpg

Make sure the hose clamps are stainless steel, including the clamp screws.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DeBangis21
Consider an elastic rubber sleeve that can be positioned on the outside of the 4" tube. To selectively block holes, slide it up or down.

An alternative would be a harder plastic sleeve that slides inside the 4" tube.

That is something I have thought about, I like it as an easy solution. The downside, but not insurmountable
is the fit around, or internal to the tube. I'm not sure how concentric the 4" tube will be. There is very low pressure (1PSI) so it doesn't need to hold pressure. It has to be tight enough to not leak, but easy enough to adjust.
Hmm... maybe a hollow tube with o-rings that will seal above and below the over flow holes. I have added my concept of a sliding hollow tube slug with o-rings to my drawing.

A piece of info I neglected to add, this will run at 90*C, but only during treatment, not when an adjustment is made. Adjustments would be only occasional.

Thanks, Mike
P.S. I have drawn with paint for 28 years, maybe it's time I learn Solidworks :-)

Vessel 8in 4in Feasible solutions to adjustable levels.png
 
jrmichler said:
Such a sleeve can be found at many hardware stores. This image is from Amazon for a 4" sleeve:
View attachment 330992
Make sure the hose clamps are stainless steel, including the clamp screws.

Sorry, I added info to my last post about temperature, the system will run at 90*C, the sleeves are made of Elastomeric Polyvinyl Chloride only good to about 50*C. I thought these were a great solution to another problem I have until I found the temperature problem. I haven't found them in a different material, but that doesn't mean they don't exist.
Thanks, Mike
 
Still open for suggestions on my question.
Thanks for your help, Mikek
 
Qmavam said:
Hmm... maybe a hollow tube with o-rings that will seal above and below the over flow holes. I have added my concept of a sliding hollow tube slug with o-rings to my drawing.
A metal tube with O-rings would not need the drilled holes because the top of the sliding tube would set the spillover height. And the O-ring friction would hold it in position.

Another idea is a piston ring compressor. Loosen using the key, slide into position, tighten, remove the key. This idea would use the drilled holes. Any auto parts store should stock them. Image of a piston ring compressor from Amazon:
Ring compressor.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DeBangis21
A metal tube with O-rings would not need the drilled holes because the top of the sliding tube would set the spillover height. And the O-ring friction would hold it in position.

Hmm... it doesn't work out that way. Both tubes are electrodes so must be conductive. Even if the sliding tune were redesigned as an adjustable height tube, the O-rings would act to insulate the sliding tube from the fixed tube. however there may be a kernel in the idea that could result in an adjustable height tube.

Another idea is a piston ring compressor. Loosen using the key, slide into position, tighten, remove the key. This idea would use the drilled holes. Any auto parts store should stock them. Image of a piston ring compressor from Amazon:

That is a nice idea, we would need to weld an extension onto an Allen wrench to reach the length. Also, I don't remember the method used to keep the piston ring compressor in it tight position. I wonder if there is room to release it.

Thanks for those ideas !! Mikek
 
Is the overall structure (the aluminum tubes) outside your control? i.e. are you forced to retrofit your solution?

Because, if you had say in the design of the aluminum, I'd design the orange and blue overflows differently so that they default to being closed and your mechanism opens them.
 
  • #10
Is the overall structure (the aluminum tubes) outside your control? i.e. are you forced to retrofit your solution?

This is all design phase. Trying to think of every aspect before build. We started with small scale test tube with a center electrode surround by and aluminum tube, Then built a 2' x 2"x 34" tall all glass vessel with aluminum tape as the electrodes and also working on a zigzag flow pattern stainless steel vessel that is yet to be completed because of insulating problems. This is a third iteration in an attempt to get a more permanent flow through system. It is still small scale but big enough.

Because, if you had say in the design of the aluminum, I'd design the orange and blue overflows differently so that they default to being closed and your mechanism opens them.

I'm very open to ideas, not sure how to implement what you describe. Can you provide more info?
Thanks for your ideas, Mikek
 
  • #11
Use the quote feature.
Qmavam said:
I'm very open to ideas, not sure how to implement what you describe. Can you provide more info?
Thanks for your ideas, Mikek
I had no specific plain in mind.

I am just thinking that the design you have sort of defaults to 'flow' and then you have to design a mechanism to close flow, which might be more complex than designing it where the default state is 'no-flow', and then you can design a movement that opens to allow flow.

(Heh. Got access to a junked clarinet or sax?)
1693069499741.png
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban
  • #12
Nice thought, but I want, simple, so we can do most of the work and only have to hire out some machining.
I'm helping my son, a chemist, I have an electronic background, we are try to do mechanical engineering. :eek:
So I'm soliciting ideas and trying come up with an idea that works and is something we can do!
Thanks for your input, Mikek
 
  • #13
Welcome, @Qmavam !

An additional idea:
To reduce the flow entering the 8-inch tube. You could use a pump of variable velocity, three position valve (if the pump is of centrifugal type), or two valves and by-pass lines.

Conventional_Multi-Component-0217.jpg
 
  • #14
Lnewqban said:
Welcome, @Qmavam !

An additional idea:
To reduce the flow entering the 8-inch tube. You could use a pump of variable velocity, three position valve (if the pump is of centrifugal type), or two valves and by-pass lines.

The flow rate is fixed by the output from another process. The treatment time in the vessel will be determined by whatever opening is chosen for the spillover. Thanks for the input, Mikek

 
  • #15
How about making the inner tube a telescoping design so you can adjust its length as needed?

Alternatively, again the inner tube is two concentric tubes, the inner one with holes in different positions so its holes can be rotated to line up with the different height holes.

Cheers,
Tom
 
  • #16
Tom.G said:
How about making the inner tube a telescoping design so you can adjust its length as needed?
And control the flow by using V-shaped slots.

1693189224322.png
 
  • #17
DaveC426913 said:
And control the flow by using V-shaped slots.

View attachment 331116
Flow volume is not the desired outcome, flow level is, the higher the level the longer the treatment time.
The telescoping tubes may be a solution, although probably harder to implement. At least for non machinists. Still all of this needs to be a conductor that is insulated, setting up an electrostatic field but not a conductive path.

"Everything looks easy until you actually try to do it!" :-)
quote of, someone, somewhere, that has had to have said this!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DaveC426913
  • #18
Another idea:
To reduce the annular volume between both tubes by inserting enough mass of an appropriate and chemically compatible material.

That will reduce the cross-section, and proportionally the treatment time, without the need for holes or related valves and mechanisms.

An inverted bucket shape that is locked at two different heights respect to the exterior aluminum tube could work... at least in my mind.

Enough annular gap (or vertical grooves) between this piston and the 4-inch thin wall aluminum spillover tube will facilitate the up flow to the top of that tube.
Please, see attached drawing.
 

Attachments

  • #19
To reduce the annular volume between both tubes by inserting enough mass of an appropriate and chemically compatible material.

Kind of like putting a brick in the toilet tank to increase water level height but reduce the Volume. Clever!
Thanks, Mikek
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban
  • #20
Hmmm. If the objective is to keep it as simple as possible without machinist skills, I'd argue for using a sleeve that's just long enough to cover both sets of holes. Want to use the lower set? Slide it up a bit. Use the upper set, slide it down. Flow over the top? Cover both.

I think you'll at least have to have some o-rings to get a good seal while still providing that insulation. But, without machinist support, that's kinda asking for trouble. You'd want a retaining groove to seat them in. ANd, you'd have to choose the material for the o-ring based on the conditions, both chemically and physically, present in the tank.
 
  • #21
Thanks for that input, I am trying to keep costs low, but once a design is fixed, we can hire some machining work out.
 
  • #22
Qmavam said:
I am trying to keep costs low,...
Put a 4" pipe thread at the bottom. Screw in, by hand, piece of 4" male taper thread pipe from a selection of different lengths.

Put a loose 4" socket at the bottom. Drop in a plain 4" pipe from a selection. Gravity will keep it there.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tom.G

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
7K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
726
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K