How Do You Calculate 4-Acceleration in Schwarzschild Coordinates?

  • Thread starter Thread starter etotheipi
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating four-acceleration in Schwarzschild coordinates, specifically addressing the equation of motion and the relevant Christoffel symbols. The initial calculations led to confusion regarding the sign of the radial component of four-acceleration, with participants identifying a mistake in the assumption of the time component of the four-velocity. Correcting the sign conventions and understanding that the metric signature affects the calculations helped clarify the results. The importance of consistent sign conventions in general relativity is emphasized, as it can significantly impact the outcome of calculations. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities and challenges of working with four-acceleration in curved spacetime.
etotheipi
Homework Statement
Find the 4-acceleration of a particle at rest on the surface of a non-rotating planet of mass ##M##
Relevant Equations
N/A
I'd just like a bit of guidance here, because I'm not sure if what I'm doing is correct. First, the equation of the motion,$$A^{\mu} = \frac{dU^{\mu}}{d\tau} + \Gamma^{\mu}_{\sigma \rho} U^{\sigma}U^{\rho}$$I decided to use the Schwarzschild coordinates ##(t,r,\theta, \phi)##, and in these coordinates I can take ##U^r = U^{\theta} = U^{\phi} = 0##. Since the coordinate acceleration is zero we get$$A^{\mu} = \Gamma^{\mu}_{tt} U^t U^t$$The relevant Christoffel symbol$$\Gamma^{\mu}_{tt} = \frac{1}{2} g^{\mu m} \left( \frac{\partial g_{mt}}{\partial x^t} + \frac{\partial g_{mt}}{\partial x^t} - \frac{\partial g_{tt}}{\partial x^m} \right) = - \frac{1}{2} g^{\mu r} \frac{\partial g_{tt}}{\partial r}$$where I used that the metric is time-independent and that ##g_{tt}## depends only on ##r##, i.e.$$g_{tt} = - \left(1- \frac{2GM}{r} \right) \iff \frac{\partial g_{tt}}{\partial r} = - \frac{2GM}{r^2}$$and so$$A^{\mu} = g^{\mu r} \frac{GM}{r^2}$$So for instance, if ##\mu = r##, we get$$g^{rr} = \left(\frac{2GM}{r} - 1 \right)^{-1} = - \left( 1 + \frac{2GM}{r} \right) + \mathcal{O}(r^{-2})$$and then$$A^{\mu} = - \left( 1 + \frac{2GM}{r} \right) \cdot \frac{GM}{r^2} = - \frac{GM}{r^2} + \mathcal{O}(r^{-3})$$I wondered, why did I get a minus sign? I expected the four-acceleration to have a positive radial component. I wonder if I've mixed up the metric signature somewhere, but don't know where. thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not quite. You seem to have assumed that ##U^t=1##, but ##g_{\mu\nu}U^\mu U^\nu=-1##, so ##U^t=1/\sqrt{|g_{tt}|}## (edit: and not ##U^t=1/\sqrt{g_{tt}}## as I originally wrote) in this case. (Edit: if I finally kept the sign conventions straight, anyway...)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes etotheipi
Thanks! I also can't seem to get the signs of the metric components right. Starting from where it went wrong,$$A^{\mu} = g^{\mu r} \frac{GM}{r^2} U^t U^t = \frac{g^{\mu r}}{g_{tt}} \frac{GM}{r^2}$$then with$$g^{rr} = (g_{rr})^{-1} = \left(1- \frac{2GM}{r} \right)$$and$$g_{tt} = -\left( 1- \frac{2GM}{r} \right)$$and in that case $$A^{r} = - \frac{GM}{r^2}$$ exactly, but now still with an incorrect sign :cry:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I made a mistake in my last post - I said that ##U^t=1/\sqrt{g_{tt}}##, but it's ##1/\sqrt{|g_{tt}|}##, so ##g_{tt}U^tU^t=\mathrm{sgn}(g_{tt})=-1##. When I correct that I get the right answer. My Christoffel symbols agree with yours, so I think you've just made the same mistake.

Sign conventions are an unbelievable pain. I like +--- because four velocities have positive moduli, and that fits in my brain better.
 
  • Love
Likes etotheipi
Ah, okay, gotcha. Yeah, that's annoying. In the future I'll make more of an effort to make an even number of sign errors.

Also, have a nice new year's eve! 🥃🍾🍻🤮
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
895
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K