MHB Need to know the official name of these type of fraction problems

  • Thread starter Thread starter rrbrisbo89
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fraction Type
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around identifying the official name for a specific type of fraction problem, particularly those involving dividing fractions by multiplying with the reciprocal. Participants explain that there isn't a widely recognized name for these problems, but emphasize the concept of dividing fractions as key. An example is provided, illustrating the process of solving a fraction equation. Additionally, there is a mention of resources for formatting math problems using LaTeX. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the underlying mathematical principles involved in these fraction problems.
rrbrisbo89
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I need to know the official name of these type of fraction problems?

This is what I wrote on a flash card I couldn't upload the flashcard because of file size.

Example problem -

4/3 times x = 6/7

These are the instructions I wrote on the flash card.

1. Divide sides by left (least) (4/3) number.

2. Cross out left number (4/3).

3. Multiply reciprocal (3/4).

Thank you.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi BR89,

Welcome to MHB! :)

I'm not aware of an official name for this kind of problem, but I would say the main idea used is dividing fractions. Dividing fractions uses the idea that if you divide by that fraction, it's the same as multiplying by the reciprocal. For example:
$$\frac{3}{\frac{2}{5}}=3 \cdot \frac{5}{2}=\frac{15}{2} $$
Or your example,
$$\frac{\frac{6}{7}}{\frac{4}{3}} = \frac{6}{7} \cdot \frac{3}{4}=\frac{18}{28}=? $$
You already had this main idea written down. Can you finish simplifying the above fraction?
 
Do you know if there are any guides to display the problem like you did in the previous post?

Thanks.
 
BR89 said:
Do you know if there are any guides to display the problem like you did in the previous post?

Thanks.
We have a LaTeX help forum on the main page (almost all the way down.) http://mathhelpboards.com/latex-help-discussion-26/. You'll pick up the basics pretty quickly.

-Dan
 
Jameson said:
Hi BR89,

Welcome to MHB! :)

I'm not aware of an official name for this kind of problem, but I would say the main idea used is dividing fractions. Dividing fractions uses the idea that if you divide by that fraction, it's the same as multiplying by the reciprocal. For example:
$$\frac{3}{\frac{2}{5}}=3 \cdot \frac{5}{2}=\frac{15}{2} $$
Or your example,
$$\frac{\frac{6}{7}}{\frac{4}{3}} = \frac{6}{7} \cdot \frac{3}{4}=\frac{18}{28}=? $$
You already had this main idea written down. Can you finish simplifying the above fraction?

[math]
\frac {6}{7} \times \frac {3} {4} = \frac {18} {28} = \frac {9} {14}\
[/math]
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top