Need to verify some proof involving Green's function.

[yungman]

This is not homework. This is actually a subset of proofing $G(\vec{x},\vec{x_0}) = G(\vec{x_0},\vec{x})$ where G is the Green's function. I don't want to present the whole thing, just the part I have question.

Let D be an open solid region with surface S. Let $P \;=\; G(\vec{x},\vec{a}) \;\hbox{ and } P \;=\; G(\vec{x},\vec{b}) \;$ where both are green function at point a and b resp. inside D. This means Q is defined at point a ( harmonic at point a ) and P is defined at point b. Both P and Q are defined in D except at a and b resp. Both equal to zero on surface S.

Green function defined:

$$G(\vec{x},\vec{x_0}) \;=\; v + H \;\hbox { where } \;v=\; \frac{-1}{4\pi|\vec{x}-\vec{x_0|}} \;\hbox{ and }\; H \;\hbox { is a harmonic function in D and on S where }\; G(\vec{x},\vec{x_0}) \;=\; 0 \;\hbox { on D}.$$

In this proof, I need to make two spherical cutout each with radius =$\epsilon$ with center at a and b. I call the spherical region of this two sphere A and B resp and the surface $S_a \;&\; S_b$ resp. Then I let $D_{\epsilon} = D -A-B$ so both P and Q are defined and harmonic in $D_{\epsilon}$.



Now come to the step I need to verify:

I want to prove:

$$^{lim}_{\epsilon\rightarrow 0} \int\int_{S_a} P\frac{\partial Q}{\partial n} \;-\; Q\frac{\partial P}{\partial n} \;dS \;=\; ^{lim}_{\epsilon\rightarrow 0} \int\int_{S_a} v\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon^2} \;dS$$



This is my work:

$$^{lim}_{\epsilon\rightarrow 0} \int\int_{S_a} P\frac{\partial Q}{\partial n} \;-\; Q\frac{\partial P}{\partial n} \;dS \;=\; ^{lim}_{\epsilon\rightarrow 0} \int\int_{S_a} (-\frac{1}{4\pi r} + H)\frac{\partial Q}{\partial n} \;-\; Q\frac{\partial }{\partial n}(-\frac{1}{4\pi r} + H) \;dS$$ (1)

Where:

$$^{lim}_{\epsilon\rightarrow 0}\; v\; =\; \frac{-1}{4\pi |\vec{x}-\vec{a}|} \;=\; ^{lim}_{\epsilon\rightarrow 0} \;\frac{-1}{4\pi r} \;$$. in sphere region A.

$$^{lim}_{\epsilon\rightarrow 0}( P=v+H )\;=\; ^{lim}_{\epsilon\rightarrow 0} (\frac{-1}{4\pi r } + H)$$


Form (1) I break into 3 parts:

$$^{lim}_{\epsilon\rightarrow 0} [ \int\int_{S_a} -\frac{1}{4\pi r}\frac{\partial Q}{\partial n} dS + \int\int_{S_a} (H\frac{\partial Q }{\partial n} \;-\; Q\frac{\partial H}{\partial n}) dS + \int\int_{S_a} Q \frac{\partial}{\partial n}(-\frac{1}{4\pi r}) \;dS]$$

$$^{lim}_{\epsilon\rightarrow 0} [ \int\int_{S_a} -\frac{1}{4\pi r}\frac{\partial Q}{\partial n} dS \;=\; -\frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon} \int\int_{S_a} \frac{\partial Q}{\partial n} dS \;=\; 0$$

Because Q is harmonic and $\int\int_{S_a} \frac{\partial Q}{\partial n} dS \;=\; 0$

From second identity:

$$\int\int_{S_a} (H\frac{\partial Q }{\partial n} \;-\; Q\frac{\partial H}{\partial n}) dS \;= \int\int\int_A (H\nabla^2 Q - Q\nabla^2 H) dV =0$$

because both H and Q are harmonic in A and on surface $S_A$.

Therefore.

$$^{lim}_{\epsilon\rightarrow 0} \int\int_{S_a} P\frac{\partial Q}{\partial n} \;-\; Q\frac{\partial P}{\partial n} \;dS \;=\; ^{lim}_{\epsilon\rightarrow 0}\int\int_{S_a} Q \frac{\partial}{\partial n}(-\frac{1}{4\pi r}) \;dS = \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon^2} \int\int_{S_a} Q dS$$

The proof of the Strauss's book is very funky to put it politely. This is the way I proof it and please bare with the long explanation and tell me whether I am correct or not.

Thanks
Alan

 

[yungman]

Anyone please?

Am I even posting in the correct sub-forum? I tried Green's function both in the Differential equation sub-forum and also in Advance Applied math in another forum with no response except a Math PHD advice to go to Electro-Dynamics type of section because PDE barely touch this.

Please advice.
Thanks
Alan

 

[Meir Achuz]

If all you need is a proof of the symmetry, there is a simple one, using the definition of the GF, in "Classical Eletromagnetism" by Franklin

 

[yungman]

If all you need is a proof of the symmetry, there is a simple one, using the definition of the GF, in "Classical Eletromagnetism" by Franklin

Thanks, I just bought it on Amazon. It is a really new book, used ones are just as expensive, cost me $80 big dollars!

Yes I can use one in between normal EM and Jackson book. It is getting hard to get help in these advanced topics.