Symmetry on the partition function

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the partition function defined as \(\displaystyle Z=\frac{1}{N! \: h^{f}} \int dq\: dp \:e^{-\beta H(q,p)}\) and its implications for pressure calculations. The transformation \(Z \rightarrow a Z\) (where \(a > 0\)) does not yield a symmetry in the context of conservation laws, as it merely shifts the energy levels without affecting observables. The discussion clarifies that this transformation does not invoke Noether's theorem since the Hamiltonian is not invariant, and the partition function is treated as a dynamical variable.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of statistical mechanics and partition functions
  • Familiarity with Hamiltonian mechanics
  • Knowledge of Noether's theorem and its implications
  • Basic concepts of thermodynamics, particularly pressure calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of the partition function in statistical mechanics
  • Explore Hamiltonian dynamics and its role in thermodynamic systems
  • Investigate Noether's theorem and its connection to symmetries in physics
  • Learn about the implications of energy shifts on observable quantities in thermodynamic systems
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physicists, particularly those specializing in statistical mechanics, thermodynamics, and theoretical physics, as well as students seeking to deepen their understanding of partition functions and conservation laws.

Mr rabbit
Messages
26
Reaction score
3
We have a partition function

## \displaystyle Z=\frac{1}{N! \: h^{f}} \int dq\: dp \:e^{-\beta H(q,p)} ##

And we obtain, for example, the pressure by ##\displaystyle p = \frac{1}{\beta} \frac{\partial\: \ln Z}{\partial V}##. So if we do the transformation ##Z \rightarrow a Z## where ##a >0## we obtain the same pressure. This is not a symmetry? It should exist a conserved quantity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The transformation ##Z \rightarrow aZ## simply takes every Boltzmann factor and multiplies it by ##a##, which is equivalent to adding a constant amount of energy ##\frac{1}{\beta}ln(a)## to the energy of each state. Shifting every energy up or down consistently won't change any observables. There's no reason why that would result in any conservation laws. If you're referring to Noether's theorem, the Hamiltonian of the system isn't invariant and the partition function is a dynamical variable. Hope that helps!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Mr rabbit
Thank you!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K