Needed: Equation for Complex Loading

  • Thread starter Thread starter tommy100
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complex
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding an equation to calculate the stress on a hollow circular tube subjected to a lateral force, specifically wind pressure. Participants explore the mechanics of bending stress in a cantilevered beam configuration, addressing theoretical and practical aspects of the problem.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about the equation for stress on a hollow circular tube fixed at the bottom and subjected to a lateral force.
  • Another participant suggests that the scenario can be modeled as a cantilevered beam and asks for clarification on how the force is applied.
  • A participant specifies that the force is a wind pressure of 1.0 kN/m² applied along the length of the tube.
  • Multiple participants present the formula for maximum bending stress, \(\sigma_{max} = \frac{My}{I}\), and discuss the calculation of the maximum moment and moment of inertia for a hollow cylinder.
  • There is a discussion about the correct expression for the moment of inertia, with some participants agreeing on the formula provided by another participant.
  • Clarifications are made regarding the meaning of pressure \(p\) in the context of the calculations, with some participants emphasizing the need to consider the units of pressure and force.
  • Concerns are raised about the assumptions made when treating pressure as a uniform load, particularly regarding its application to a curved beam.
  • One participant suggests that the wind loading should be verified for accuracy in the context of the calculations presented.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the use of the cantilever beam model and the formulas for bending stress and moment of inertia, but there are competing views regarding the treatment of pressure as a uniform load and the implications of wind loading on the calculations. The discussion remains unresolved on some technical details and assumptions.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the application of pressure as a uniform load on a curved beam and the need for verification of wind loading assumptions. The discussion highlights the complexity of integrating pressure effects in beam calculations.

tommy100
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
does anyone know an equation that can help me find the stress of a hollow circular tube standing up-right and fixed at the bottom, and also a force is pushing it from one side?
many thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The case is just a simple cantelivered beam; it doesn't matter which way it stands neglecting gravity). Exactly how and where is the force applied?
 
the force is actually a wind of 1.0KN/m^2
so it will be applied across the whole length of the tube
 
The maximum bending stress is
\sigma_{max} = \frac{My}{I}
Where M is the maximum moment, y is your radius, and I is the moment of inertia. For a cantelivered case, the maximum moment is at the base (obviously). We can get an equivalent force of all the pressures combined, which will act at the center of applied pressure (the center of the beam). The total force is
F = pL
Since it is applied at the center of the beam, the moment it creates on the base is:
M = Fd = pL(L/2) = \frac{pL^2}{2}
The moment of inertia for a hollow cylinder is:
I = \frac{\pi r^4}{4}
So, your maximum bending stress is then (canceling out the r term)
\sigma_{max} = \frac{2pL^2}{\pi r^3}

By the way, how were you able to get such an accurate loading for wind?
 
Last edited:
minger said:
The maximum bending stress is
\sigma_{max} = \frac{My}{I}
Where M is the maximum moment, y is your radius, and I is the moment of inertia. For a cantelivered case, the maximum moment is at the base (obviously). We can get an equivalent force of all the pressures combined, which will act at the center of applied pressure (the center of the beam). The total force is
F = pL
Since it is applied at the center of the beam, the moment it creates on the base is:
M = Fd = pL(L/2) = \frac{pL^2}{2}
The moment of inertia for a hollow cylinder is:
I = \frac{\pi r^4}{4}
So, your maximum bending stress is then (canceling out the r term)
\sigma_{max} = \frac{2pL^2}{\pi r^3}

By the way, how were you able to get such an accurate loading for wind?

For a hollow cylinder (i.e. tube or pipe) the moment of inertia is:

I = \frac{\pi}{4} \cdot (r_o^4 - r_i^4)

Which would make the max stress at the base:

\sigma_{max} = \frac{pL^2y}{2I}

CS
 
I agree with the moment of inertia posted by stewartcs, but the maximum stress on the tube is sigma_max = p*[(ro*L)^2]/I, where ro = tube outside radius, and L = tube length.
 
nvn said:
I agree with the moment of inertia posted by stewartcs, but the maximum stress on the tube is sigma_max = p*[(ro*L)^2]/I, where ro = tube outside radius, and L = tube length.

Not for a cantilevered beam with a uniform load it wouldn't.

CS
 
thanx for your reply

what does the p stand for in F=pL?

cheers
 
p is the uniform pressure in units of force/length
 
  • #10
tommy100: In my post, p is pressure. According to your second post, pressure p = 1.0 kPa. Pressure has units of force per unit area.
 
  • #11
For beam calculations, we typically treat the problem as a 2d problem, and p (or w as its sometimes called) has units of force/length. Remember that multiplying that uniform loading by the length of the loading gives an equivalent force.

If you have an actual pressure, then you'll need to take into account the shape of the beam and integrate the pressure around to find the net force in the vertical direction.
 
  • #12
minger said:
For beam calculations, we typically treat the problem as a 2d problem, and p (or w as its sometimes called) has units of force/length. Remember that multiplying that uniform loading by the length of the loading gives an equivalent force.

If you have an actual pressure, then you'll need to take into account the shape of the beam and integrate the pressure around to find the net force in the vertical direction.

minger brings up a good point (I actually overlooked the wind loading and took p = w). So for a wind load the equivalent force on the column would be:

F = \rho A V^2 C

where,

\rho is the air density
A is the area
V is the wind velocity
C is the shape factor

Which would then make the max stress:

\sigma_{max} = \frac{\rho A V^2 C L y}{2I}

CS
 
  • #13
tommy100 already gave the differential pressure, p = 1.0 kPa, in post 3. The answer in my post already takes that into account. For the given differential pressure, all he needs to do is plug pressure p = 1.0 kPa into the formula in my post.
 
  • #14
But...pressure always acts normal to the surface. When we just use pressure as the uniform loading, it's assuming that the loading is also uniform across the beam (into the paper). However, since the beam is curved, the vertical component of the pressure varies across the beam.

For the most part, it was just semantics. For a 2d beam, the loading has units of force/length, not force/area. If you have a variable that's force/area, you need to determine if this is applicable to be able to use. In this case, it's probably fine because at the very least it will be a conservative estimate.

Again though, the determination of the pressure from wind loading should be verified.
 
  • #15
I already took that into account. For the given pressure (post 3), all tommy100 needs to do is plug pressure p = 1.0 kPa into the formula in my post (post 6).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K