In chapter 4, Kittel is setting up the differential equations for the forces involved in lattice vibrations. I understand the concept, the only problem I'm running into is why he chose the solution he did.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Here goes:

He states that the differential equation is

[tex]M\ddot{u_{s}}=C(u_{s+1}+u_{s-1}-2u_{s})[/tex]

I understand this. He then goes to say that all displacements must have some time dependence of

[tex]exp(-Iwt)[/tex]

Again, I understand why he says this. Then if you put this into the differential equation you get the following

[tex]-w^2 u_{s} M=C(u_{s+1}+u_{s-1}-2u_{s})[/tex]

He then states "This is a difference equation in the displacements u and has traveling wave solutions of the form:"

[tex]u_{s\pm1}=uexp(IsKa)exp(\pm IKa)[/tex]

This is where I'm running into the issue. Why does he have uexp(IsKa)exp(IKa) to the solution of u(s+-1)?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Needing explanation of Kittel Intro to Solid States chapter 4.

Loading...

Similar Threads - Needing explanation Kittel | Date |
---|---|

I I need help understanding the meaning of Bloch waves | Feb 23, 2018 |

A To use the the d.E form of the Hamiltonian, does the state need to be transformed? | Feb 15, 2017 |

A Do we need Lindblad operators to describe spontaneous emission | Dec 8, 2016 |

A I need information on a solid state question -- gas to solid transistion | Jun 13, 2016 |

XRD Scherrer Equation need explanation | Oct 3, 2008 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**