1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Neeeeed helppppp for a question,, (not hw)

  1. Mar 16, 2007 #1
    neeeeed helppppp for a question,,urgent!!(not hw)

    Hi, I have been working on this question for some time,, but still couldn't solve it,,does anyone have an idea? thanks for helping!

    Prove that if f is a twice differentiable function with f(0)=0 and f(1)=1 and f '(0)=f '(1)=0, then / f ' ' (x) / >=4 for some x in [0,1].
    In more picturesque terms: A particle which travels a unit distance in a unit time, and starts and ends with velocity 0, has at some time an acceleration>=4

    Hint:Prove that either f ' ' (x)>4 for some x in [0, 1/2] or f ' '(x)<-4 for some x in [1/2, 1].

    and show that in fact we must have/ f ''(x)/ >4 for some x in [0,1]
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Mar 16, 2007 #2

    J77

    User Avatar

    Perhaps you could show some of your working?

    And how urgent can it be if it's not "hw"?
     
  4. Mar 16, 2007 #3
    it will probably be a test question on the test tmr....

    using contradition? or not..i dont have enough time to think about it now, just want to see some clues.
     
    Last edited: Mar 16, 2007
  5. Mar 16, 2007 #4
    i m not sure if my answer is completed,, can anyone check it for me? thx!
    suppose f''(x)<4 for all x in [0, 1/2],apply mean value theorem,if0<=x<=1/2
    (f'(x)-f'(0))/(x-0)<4 ==> f'(x)<4x,one more time mean value theorem,if0<=x<=1/2
    (f(x)-f(0))/(x-0)<4x ==>f(x)<4x^2 f(1/2)<1
    suppose f''(x)>-4 for all x in [1/2,1]
    (f'(1)-f'(x))/(1-x)>-4 ==> f'(x)<4(1-x)
    (f(1)-f(x))/(1-x)<4(1-x)=>f(x)>1-4(1-x)^2 f(1/2)>1 contradition
    therefore, either f''(x)>=4 for some x in [0, 1/2],orf''(x)<=-4 for some x in [1/2,1]
     
  6. Mar 16, 2007 #5

    matt grime

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    That can't possibly be right.

    Consider an f satisfying f''=0 identically on [0,1/2]. Obviously it fails the first half of your condition. And it is easy to complete it to a smooth function satisfying the boundary conditions with f'' =>0.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Neeeeed helppppp for a question,, (not hw)
  1. Derivative HW (Replies: 2)

  2. A question (Replies: 1)

  3. FTC Question (Replies: 16)

  4. Trigonometry Question (Replies: 1)

  5. Integration question (Replies: 4)

Loading...