Negative and Complex Probability?

Click For Summary
In quantum mechanics, probability amplitudes can be positive, negative, or complex, which differs from classical probabilities that range from 0 to 1. These amplitudes can be visualized as arrows in a plane, with the probability of a system transitioning to a particular state being the square of the arrow's length. While the concept may seem complex, it can be understood without advanced mathematics, as suggested by Richard Feynman's book "QED: The Strange Theory of Light and Matter." The distinction between probability and probability amplitude is crucial for grasping quantum phenomena. Understanding these concepts can enhance comprehension of quantum mechanics without requiring a calculus background.
WhiteRae
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
I'm currently reading "The Black Hole War" by Leonard Susskind. I'm the book the author says that when predicting probability in quantum you can have positive, negative, or complex numbers. How is this possible? The book literally says, "Do not try to understand this. Just accept it." I asked the AP Physics teacher at my school but she never even heard of this before. Is it possible to explain this to someone with no calculus background? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Probabilities are never negative or complex. Probabilities are always numbers satisfying 0 ≤ x ≤ 1.

In quantum mechanics, there are complex probability amplitudes, which are not the same as probabilities.
 
Now that I reread it I see it said probability amplitudes can be positive, negative, or complex numbers. What exactly is that? Every explanation I find involves complex math (since I'm not taking Calc 1 until next year almost all math is complex to me).
 
You can think of probability amplitudes as arrows in the plane. If a quantum system can go into either of two states upon measurement, then there are two of these arrows, one for each process. The probability that it goes into the first state is the length squared of the first arrow. The probability that it goes into the second state is the length squared of the second arrow.

It's actually not a very difficult concept. I highly recommend Richard Feynman's popular book "QED: The Strange Theory of Light and Matter" where he explains what probability amplitudes are and how you can use them to understand various phenomena, all without the use of any advanced mathematics.
 
Thanks.
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 149 ·
5
Replies
149
Views
12K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K