Net Electric Force on +q Charge with Two Added Charges

  • Thread starter Thread starter aeromat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charges
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The net electric force on the +q charge, when two additional +Q charges are introduced, is not three times greater than before, as initially suggested by Student 1. Instead, the forces from the two +Q charges partially cancel each other due to their positioning, resulting in a net force that is greater than the original but less than three times its magnitude. The discussion emphasizes the importance of vector addition in calculating the resultant force, highlighting that while the forces are repulsive, their components must be considered to determine the net effect accurately.

PREREQUISITES
  • Coulomb's Law for calculating electric forces
  • Vector addition and decomposition of forces
  • Understanding of electric charge interactions
  • Basic knowledge of force vectors and their components
NEXT STEPS
  • Study vector addition techniques in physics
  • Learn how to apply Coulomb's Law in multi-charge systems
  • Explore the concept of electric field and its relation to force
  • Investigate scenarios where forces partially cancel each other out
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electromagnetism, physics educators, and anyone interested in understanding electric forces and vector analysis in charge interactions.

aeromat
Messages
113
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two more +Q charges are held in place the same distance "s" away from the +q charge as shown. Consider the following student dialogue concerning the net force on the +q charge:

The two added charges are written with blue Q's

Student 1: "The net electric force on the +q charge is now three times as large as before, since there are now three positive charges exerting forces on it."

Student 2: "I don't think so. The force from the +Q charge on the left will cencel the force from +Q charge on the right. The net electric force will be the same as in part A."

Physics-QuestionFromAssignment.png


Homework Equations


Coulomb's Law

The Attempt at a Solution


What I did was I drew out that diagram above on a piece of paper and each line I drew pointing from the +q to the Q was exactly the same length. Next, I drew the force vectors after(in this case, it would be repulsion), and they ended up looking something like this:
Physics-Question2FromAssignment.png


I found that it was less than three times one of the forces. Also, they could'nt have canceled each other out because they were repulsive. However, I know I could show this through visually, but how could I prove it mathematically (using physics formulae) that this is correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
don't discount the value of a proof by drawing. you have shown that the total force is more than before, not not 3 times more, so both students are wrong.

if you do want to show it with math, you need to calculate the force (remember it is a vector) from each charge and then add them together (using vector addition) to get the total force. it is exactly what you have done in your drawing, but with symbols. if you want, i can show you how that is done, but i like your proof just fine.

one thing you say is wrong. the two new charges don't cancel each other out completely, but they do a little, that is why there is not 3 times as much force. if they were placed in such a way that q was half way between them and on the line connecting them, then they would cancel completely. it would be like two people pushing you, one form each side; you won't go anywhere.

hope this helps
 
if you want, i can show you how that is done
Yes, please if you can. I understand what you mean by them not cancelling out completely, thank you for your help on that.
 
ok, i won't go through all the gory details of using coulomb's law, i will just go through adding the vectors. we can fill in the details later if you want.

so, we have three vectors, call them A, B and C, and these will be the forces from the charges starting from the left. so, in your figure, A is the bottom vector, B is the vertical one, and C is the top one.

hmm... let me get a better feel for what you know of vectors before i go on. a few questions for you:

have you ever worked with vectors before?

do you know how to find the components of a vector?
 
eczeno said:
ok, i won't go through all the gory details of using coulomb's law, i will just go through adding the vectors. we can fill in the details later if you want.

so, we have three vectors, call them A, B and C, and these will be the forces from the charges starting from the left. so, in your figure, A is the bottom vector, B is the vertical one, and C is the top one.

hmm... let me get a better feel for what you know of vectors before i go on. a few questions for you:

have you ever worked with vectors before?

do you know how to find the components of a vector?

Alright this is what I know about vectors:
> Dot/Cross Product
> Splitting a vector into its x/y components
> Scalar/Vector projections

So yes, I do have a good base when it comes with vectors.
 
oh, great, then this will be easy. Each force has the same magnitude F, but the blue forces are not exactly vertical, so they have components Fx and Fy, but, while they have the same y component, they x components will be in opposite directions.

so, when we add the forces together, we add all the x and all the y components, like this:

F_{tot}_x=F_x-F_x=0

and

F_{tot}_y=F+F_y+F_y<3F
 
So if the Fx forces did not cancel each other out, then the net force would be 3 times as great?
 
maybe; say you put all three charges in a clump where the original Q was, then the force would be 3x greater. but, if you put both charges together on one side, but away from the bottom charge. then their x components would add, and so would their y, but the total force would still be < 3x bigger. this is because the bottom charge and the two blue charges would be, in a sense, fighting against each other a little bit.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
917
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
866
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K