Net Torque for Constant Velocity Bike Gear Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter courtney1121
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bike Gear
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the mechanics of a bicycle's rear wheel and sprocket system, particularly focusing on net torque in relation to maintaining constant velocity while cycling uphill. Participants are exploring the relationship between gear size, torque, and the forces involved in pedaling.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the relationship between sprocket size and the force exerted on the pedals, particularly in terms of torque. Some are attempting to understand how increasing the radius of the sprocket affects the net torque and the ability to maintain constant velocity while cycling uphill.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants offering different perspectives on the mechanics of torque and force in cycling. Some have provided insights into the implications of gear choice on pedaling efficiency and the challenges posed by gravity when cycling uphill.

Contextual Notes

There appears to be some uncertainty regarding the definitions of torque and the forces at play, as well as how these relate to the concept of constant velocity in the context of cycling. Participants are also reflecting on personal experiences related to physical exertion while cycling.

courtney1121
Messages
68
Reaction score
0
The rear wheel of a bicycle has a set of sprockets whcih vary in size. The chain hooks onto the sprockets, and when a pulling force is apply to the chain, the sprocket, hence the wheel turns. As any cyclist knows, when going up a hill, to maintain a constant velocity, it is better to use a lower gear, or larger sprocket. Why? In your answer, consider what the net torque is at constant velocity.

Ok so obviously, the larger the sprocket the easier it is to pedal, but I'm not quite sure why...I don't even know if that will apply here or not.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Any suggestions?
 
to explain in terms of torque...if the radius is increasing the force must decrease...causing there less force to be exerted on the pedals if the radius is large...soo should there be no net torque on the bike? how does this relate in terms of constant velocity?
 
courtney1121 said:
to explain in terms of torque...if the radius is increasing the force must decrease...causing there less force to be exerted on the pedals if the radius is large...soo should there be no net torque on the bike? how does this relate in terms of constant velocity?
My ankles are weaker than my wrists. It is about torque, but not less force. When going uphill, gravity is trying to pull you back down; to counteract it and move at a steady pace, without slowing because of that hill, you've got to apply more torque to keep yourself moving ahead. The idea is to apply the same force, or not much more, as when riding level, but with the increase in radius, the torque will increase even at that same force, and this increase in torque will result in keeping you from slowing, i.e., moving at constant speed rather than decelerating.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
10K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K