[Neuroscience] Neurophenomenology

  • Thread starter microsansfil
  • Start date
  • Tags
    neuroscience
In summary, the conversation discusses whether Neurophenomenology, a research program initiated by Francisco Varela, is considered a scientific approach. The discussion also mentions the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) and its role in advancing science and health. The conversation concludes by questioning whether the approach is falsifiable and therefore considered scientific.
  • #1
microsansfil
325
43
Hi all,

Neurophenomenology a scientific research program initiated by Francisco Varela Is it considered a scientific approach ?

On NCBI which is a National Center for Biotechnology Information advances science and health by providing access to biomedical and genomic information.



If it is not, what argument disprove that it is a scientific approach ?

Patrick
 
Last edited:
Biology news on Phys.org
  • #2
To be discussed here the paper has to be published in a journal accepted by us. It cannot be mostly philosophy. Varela does both, so you need to be careful.
 
  • #3
From your link:

"Neurophenomenological (NP) methods integrate objective and subjective data in ways that retain the statistical power of established disciplines (like cognitive science) while embracing the value of first-person reports of experience."

Using first-person reports is common in psychology, do you consider that to be a "scientific approach"?
 
  • #4
This might be of interest to you. It's based on genetics rather than neuroscience, but includes a phenomenological component.

Does a unique olfactory genome imply a unique olfactory world?

The team then explored the effect of naturally occurring functional variations in olfactory receptor genes on odorant perception in an ethnically diverse human population. They discovered that different haplotypes of a given receptor subtype conferred different perceived valence and intensity for a given odorant. Specifically, haplotypic variation in the olfactory receptor subtype OR10G4 allowed them to predict ~15% of the variance in perceived intensity and ~10% of the perceived pleasantness for the odorant guaiacol, which is typically described as 'smoky'. Thus, by providing evidence for variability across individuals at the level of peripheral olfactory processing and by linking the in vitro functional differences with differences in human olfactory perception, this study supports the notion of a 'private nose' for each person10, 11, reflecting that person's specific genetic makeup.

http://www.nature.com/neuro/journal/v17/n1/full/nn.3608.html

nn.3608-F1.jpg


[10] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12730696
[11] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17873857
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #5
microsansfil said:
Hi all,

Neurophenomenology a scientific research program initiated by Francisco Varela Is it considered a scientific approach ?

On NCBI which is a National Center for Biotechnology Information advances science and health by providing access to biomedical and genomic information.
If it is not, what argument disprove that it is a scientific approach ?

Patrick
I think its debatable whether this approach is scientific. There is no general consensus on whether the hard problem of consciousness can be addressed scientifically, or on which approaches to solving the problem are scientific.

Even worse, there is no general consensus on what "scientific" even means (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demarcation_problem). Nevertheless, a good starting point to judge whether a theory is scientific is to ask whether it is falsifiable. Based on the wikipedia page, I can't figure out enough about this neurophenomenology approach to answer that.
 

What is neurophenomenology?

Neurophenomenology is a scientific approach that combines neuroscience and phenomenology to study the relationship between the brain and subjective experiences. It explores how the brain creates and perceives conscious experiences.

How does neurophenomenology differ from other neuroscience approaches?

Neurophenomenology differs from other neuroscience approaches because it emphasizes the importance of subjective experiences and the first-person perspective in understanding the brain. It also integrates philosophical concepts and methods into scientific research.

What are some key principles of neurophenomenology?

Some key principles of neurophenomenology include the idea that consciousness arises from the dynamic interaction between the brain, body, and environment, and that subjective experiences are crucial in understanding brain function. Additionally, neurophenomenology values the integration of multiple disciplines and methods in studying the brain and consciousness.

What are some techniques used in neurophenomenology research?

Some techniques used in neurophenomenology research include neuroimaging methods such as fMRI, EEG, and MEG, as well as qualitative methods such as phenomenological interviews and first-person reports. These techniques allow researchers to study both the neural correlates of subjective experiences and the subjective experiences themselves.

What are some potential applications of neurophenomenology?

Neurophenomenology has potential applications in various fields, such as psychology, psychiatry, and neurology. It can also inform our understanding of consciousness, self-awareness, and the mind-body connection. Additionally, neurophenomenology may have practical applications in areas such as mindfulness, meditation, and well-being.

Similar threads

  • Biology and Medical
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
6
Views
743
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
698
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • General Discussion
Replies
12
Views
1K
Back
Top