Neutral Pion Decay: What Forbids EM Force?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter physguy09
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Decay Neutral Pion
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The neutral pion decays via the process \(\pi \rightarrow \gamma\gamma\), but this decay is not classified as electromagnetic (EM) due to the conservation laws governing axial current density. While parity, G-parity, energy, strangeness, and angular momentum are conserved, the decay is prohibited under the conservation of the axial current density \(j_A^\mu\). This indicates that although the decay produces two gamma photons, it does not qualify as an EM decay due to the anomaly associated with the axial current.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of particle decay processes
  • Familiarity with conservation laws in particle physics
  • Knowledge of axial current density and its implications
  • Basic concepts of quantum field theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of axial current conservation in particle physics
  • Research the role of anomalies in quantum field theories
  • Learn about the Chern-Simons current and its relationship to electromagnetic fields
  • Explore the differences between strong force and electromagnetic decay mechanisms
USEFUL FOR

Particle physicists, students of quantum field theory, and anyone interested in the nuances of particle decay processes and conservation laws.

physguy09
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
So I know the neutral pion decays as
\pi \rightarrow \gamma\gamma

my question is though, what forbids this from being an electromagnetic decay? I know it is not decaying via the strong force as there are no quarks resulting from decay. However, I do not see what forbids this from decaying via the EM force, if it is spitting out two gammas, which is the EM force carrier. Parity, G-parity, and Energy are conserved, as well as strangeness and angular momentum, so, what exactly forbids this from being EM?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What makes you think it isn't an electromagnetic decay?

I would say that it is.
 
EM it is, but anomaly.
 
It's not forbidden but it would be under conservation of
the axial current density j_A^\mu. (The latter is only conserved
together with the Chern Simons current of the EM field)

Regards, Hans
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
8K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
9K