Neutrino collision with a proton,neutron or an electron?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the interactions between neutrinos and other subatomic particles, specifically protons, neutrons, and electrons. Neutrinos interact via the weak force, allowing for reactions such as νe + p → n + e+ and νe + e → μ + νμ, although these events are extremely rare due to the weak interaction's low cross-section. The conversation highlights that while neutrinos can theoretically collide with electrons, such interactions are more accurately described as interactions rather than collisions, given the nature of point particles. The discussion also emphasizes the significance of energy thresholds for these interactions to occur.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of weak force interactions in particle physics
  • Familiarity with neutrino detection methods and cross-section concepts
  • Knowledge of beta decay processes and their implications
  • Basic principles of particle interactions and conservation laws
NEXT STEPS
  • Research neutrino oscillations and the MSW effect
  • Explore the concept of particle cross-sections in detail
  • Study the mechanisms of beta decay and its role in weak force interactions
  • Investigate the implications of neutrino interactions in astrophysics and cosmology
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of particle physics, and researchers interested in neutrino interactions and their implications in fundamental physics.

jayaramas
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
what happens if a neutrino hits head on with a proton,neutron or an electron?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


A neutrino is highly non interacting. But there are possibilities for interaction so long as no conservation law is broken.
 


From what I remember, a neutrino does interact with the weak force. So if it hits a proton or neutron head on, then it will be affected. An electron is a point particle, so you can't get another point particle, such as a neutrino, to hit "head on" with it in some sense. The electron doesn't interact with the weak force anyway, from what I know, so there would be no effect, except perhaps gravitational forces.
 


Several possibilities. Among them:

νe + p → n + e+

νe + e → μ + νμ
 


so if u calculate number of protons in Earth and still considering that all solar neutrinos pass through it is not justifiable is it?
 


jayaramas said:
so if u calculate number of protons in Earth and still considering that all solar neutrinos pass through it is not justifiable is it?

I assume you mean it is unlikely, yes? Unlikely is not the same as impossible. It is a valid question.
 


what is the reverse process? any way neutrino came from a nuclear reaction, so a fast moving neutrino can hit and attains its position back. why is it not likely?
 


jayaramas said:
what is the reverse process? any way neutrino came from a nuclear reaction, so a fast moving neutrino can hit and attains its position back. why is it not likely?

Consider
n → p + e^{-} + \bar{\nu}_{e}
The chances of the products all colliding back together at the same time are negligibly tiny.

but ok fine you could have a slightly different process:
p + \bar{\nu}_{e} → n + e^{+}
In this case I think the problem is that neutrinos interact very weakly and the scattering has to exceed a minimum threshold energy to happen (since this reaction requires energy input), and this has a very low chance of occurring. i.e. you would need very fast neutrinos indeed to start with, and even then they will hardly interact anyway.
 
Last edited:


Basically, these inverse decay processes are how neutrinos are detected in neutrino detectors.
 
  • #10


jetwaterluffy said:
The electron doesn't interact with the weak force anyway, from what I know, so there would be no effect, except perhaps gravitational forces.

Not true. Actually, beta decay is the paradigmatic weak force interaction.
 
  • #11


bbbeard said:
Not true. Actually, beta decay is the paradigmatic weak force interaction.

Yeah, I worked that out after I had already posted. However, I still can't see how they can "collide".
 
  • #12


jetwaterluffy said:
Yeah, I worked that out after I had already posted. However, I still can't see how they can "collide".

Think of it as an interaction, rather than a collision.

A particular particle interaction has a measure of reactivity which is termed a cross-section. As the name suggests, this quantity is actually in units of area - it could be expressed in square metres, though the more commonly used unit is the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barn_(unit)" . But you can loosely think of this as the "target area" that the other particle has to "hit" for an interaction to occur.

An electron and an (anti-)neutrino can combine to form a W- boson. In any practical scenario, this W- will be virtual as its mass is far larger than those of the incoming particles, so it will almost immediately decay again, and can usually only decay back into another e and neutrino because any other decay route would produce particles of higher energy. So the end result in this case is simply an elastic collision.

But electrons and (non-anti-)neutrinos can also interact. In this case, the electron could give off a W- and thereby transform itself into a neutrino, while the W- is absorbed by the original neutrino and is thus transformed into an electron. Swap ya! :smile: (Alternatively, the neutrono could emit a W+ which the electron then absorbs, with the same end result.) Again, this is an elastic collision.

The second type of interaction can also take place but with a Z0 instead of a W. In this case the electron could interact with either a neutrino or an anti-neutrino. Interactions with Z0 do not change the identities of the incoming particles.

These interactions all have extremely small cross-sections - but they do happen. The W interactions are the basis of the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MSW_effect" which has to be taken account of when looking at neutrino oscillations where the neutrinos have traveled through regions containing matter.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
997
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K