Neutrino Oscillation: Explaining the Solar Neutrino Problem

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the solar neutrino problem, specifically addressing the concept of neutrino oscillation and the necessity of mass for this phenomenon. Participants explore theoretical aspects, mathematical implications, and comparisons with other particles.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that neutrinos need mass to oscillate because different masses are the only distinguishing features of the three flavors.
  • Others argue that oscillation requires a mass difference, as having equal energies leads to only phase changes without oscillation.
  • A participant mentions that while neutrinos can oscillate due to mass differences, other models explaining neutrino oscillation without mass have been ruled out by experiments.
  • It is suggested that electrons, muons, and tauons do not oscillate because their larger masses lead to a loss of coherence over short distances.
  • One participant emphasizes the importance of mixed states in understanding neutrino oscillation, noting that neutrinos exist in both mass eigenstates and weak eigenstates.
  • Another participant states that oscillation requires an off-diagonal term in the Hamiltonian, which leads to a mass difference when diagonalized.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity of mass for oscillation and the implications of mixed states, indicating that multiple competing perspectives remain without consensus.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations include the dependence on definitions of eigenstates and the unresolved mathematical details regarding the Hamiltonian and its implications for oscillation.

nhmllr
Messages
183
Reaction score
1
I've been reading about the solar neutrino problem.
I heard that if the neutrinos had mass, then they could "oscillate" between all three types. Whatever. I'll buy it.

But here are two things I don't get:

Why do they need mass to oscillate (is it because having different masses is the only distinguishing features of the three flavors)?

Why don't electrons, muons, and tauons also oscillate between each other? They have different masses and have the same charge.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the answer is very mathematical. I don't understand the maths so I cannot help and from your post I don't think you will either so this is one of the thing we have to acept rather than uinderstand. Which is why at some point I want to study physics to a much higher level than I can currently explain.
 
the reason they need a mass difference is close to this:
if you have an initial state that is a sum of three states that have equal energies, then each of these states evolves with a factor of exp[-iEt] meaning it only changes by a phase,, if they had different energies the state changes over time and in the case of neutrinos we get a non-zero probability of finding a type other than the one we started with.
that's my primitive understanding.

this might be relevant: https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=3457913#post3457913
 
nhmllr said:
I've been reading about the solar neutrino problem.
I heard that if the neutrinos had mass, then they could "oscillate" between all three types. Whatever. I'll buy it.

But here are two things I don't get:

Why do they need mass to oscillate (is it because having different masses is the only distinguishing features of the three flavors)?

Why don't electrons, muons, and tauons also oscillate between each other? They have different masses and have the same charge.

Thanks
neutrino mass difference (and mixing) will lead to oscillation. But there were several other models explain neutrino oscillation without neutrino masses. Unfortunately, they were ruled out by some experiments. Neutrino mass is the only one survived.

Electron, muon, tauon and quarks cannot oscillate because they are much heavier. Their large masses (wrt neutrinos) make them lost their coherence in an extremely short time/distance. Thus, they cannot oscillate after that.
 
To understand how neutrinos oscillate, you have to understand the concept of mixed states, which is why "neutrino mixing" is sometimes suggested as a better term than "neutrino oscillations". As you might know from Quantum Mechanics, particles are described as existing in quantum states (technically, "eigenstates" of some observable quantity), some of which are stable, others of which are not. As it happens, a neutrino can exist in a mass eigenstate, where its mass is well-defined, or in a Weak eigenstate, where its identity as electron-, mu-, or tau-neutrinos is well-defined.

These states are not the same, and moreover, each kind is a mixture of the other. That is to say, a neutrino in a mass eigenstate is in a mix of all three Weak eigenstates, and conversely, a neutrino on a Weak eigenstate (such as an electron neutrino) is in a mix of mass eigenstates.

Being in a mixed state means that if the observable quantity whose states are mixed is measured, any one of the values corresponding to those state can be observed. The relative probabilities of those different values evolve with time, hence oscillations.

The point of all this is that if the neutrinos masses are all zero, then this mixing goes away and you don't get the oscillation.
 
If you would like to know a the general idea of neutrino oscillations then check out this blog post on the Neutrino Science blog.

Identity Crisis

For more in-depth information follow this ongoing series of posts

Coming At It From All Angles: Part 1
Coming At It From All Angles: Part 2
http://neutrinoscience.blogspot.com/2011/06/coming-at-it-from-all-angles-part-3.html

Please do ask questions in the comments or I will check back here when I can.
 
The answer is a lot simpler than the responses above. Oscillation requires an off diagonal term in the Hamiltonian, and when the Hamiltonian is diagonalized this necessarily leads to a mass difference.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 87 ·
3
Replies
87
Views
21K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K