Can dark energy prevent neutron stars from collapsing into black holes?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the potential role of dark energy in preventing neutron stars from collapsing into black holes. It posits that while gravity typically overcomes neutron degeneracy pressure, quark degeneracy pressure may provide additional resistance to collapse, potentially leading to the formation of quark stars. The conversation also explores the implications of dark energy, suggesting that if it behaves like particles trapped between neutrons, it could exert a repulsive force that counters gravity, thus preventing singularities during black hole formation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of neutron star structure and degeneracy pressure
  • Familiarity with quark theory and quark stars
  • Knowledge of dark energy and its properties
  • Basic grasp of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of quark stars and their formation processes
  • Explore the implications of dark energy in astrophysics
  • Study the Heisenberg uncertainty principle in the context of particle physics
  • Investigate current theories on singularities and black hole formation
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, and students of theoretical physics interested in the dynamics of neutron stars, black hole formation, and the role of dark energy in cosmic phenomena.

kurious
Messages
633
Reaction score
0
How can gravity overcome the degeneracy pressure of neutrons in a neutron star? Isn't such a thing the same as violating the uncertainty principle?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
No violations occur. The neutrons decompose into quarks and the whole thing collapses to form a black hole... probably. It is possible, however, there is a such thing as a 'quark degeneracy pressure' [i.e., the quarks may put up some additional resistance to further collapse]. In this case, the next stop on the road to a black hole would be a quark star. This would be a pretty spooky critter and there is actually is at least one 'suspect' in the case. See
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap020414.html
 
Presumably if the quarks don't hold out then they have structure and form
smaller particles or the quarks form heavier quarks pentaquarks etc?
The photo on that link is great.
 
Last edited:
kurious said:
Presumably if the quarks don't hold out then they have structure and form
smaller particles or the quarks form heavier quarks pentaquarks etc?
The photo on that link is great.
I'm not sure anyone has done the calculations to see if there's another plateau of stability below 'quark degeneracy'. Even if they have, my guess would be we'd be into a region where the Standard Model isn't a reliable guide any more ... it's in an energy (etc) regime that's not well explored in Earthly accelerators (or not explored at all), and 'beyond the SM' physics has essentially no observational basis today.
 
If the casimir vacuum force for plates gave the opposite result to what it normally does
then neutrons could be held apart by this force.Trouble with this idea is that
the casimir would be expected to increase above its normal level (it's been tested over a plate separation of 10^-7 m) and push neutrons even closer together for the kind of distance that neutrons in a neutron star are separated by ( 10^ -15 metres).Perhaps dark energy is more concentrated than usual in the gaps between neutrons in a neutron star and pushes outward against gravity.If dark energy consisted of particles then according to the Heisenberg uncertainty principle if these were trapped between neutrons in a neutron star then the small uncertainty in their position would give them a large momentum and a large repulsive force and hence they would counter the gravitational force strongly.And perhaps dark energy behaving like this could stop singularities forming when stars become black holes.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 109 ·
4
Replies
109
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K