Neutron Star Stability: Speed of Sound vs Light

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the stability of neutron stars, particularly focusing on the relationship between the speed of sound and the speed of light within these stars. It explores theoretical implications of these speeds on neutron star mass limits and causality, as well as potential scenarios involving pulsars and gas clouds.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that if the speed of sound in a medium were equal to the speed of light, it would lead to significant implications for causality, particularly in neutron stars.
  • It is noted that the speed of sound in neutron stars increases with density, which may impose limits on maximum mass, with concerns about causality if the speed of sound exceeds the speed of light.
  • One participant questions the implications of a pulsar being at the causality limit and what would happen if it absorbed a gas cloud, specifically whether it would instantly collapse into a black hole.
  • Another participant argues that a real star cannot be "at the causality limit," suggesting that such a scenario would indicate incorrect measurements or an invalid equation of state.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of the causality limit for neutron stars and pulsars, with no consensus reached on the scenarios involving gas clouds and black hole formation.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the measurements of mass and radius in relation to the causality limit, as well as the validity of the equations of state being discussed.

GeorgeDishman
Messages
419
Reaction score
29
[This thread was split from https://www.physicsforums.com/threa...wave-travelling-together.878450/#post-5518001 as it's an interesting topic in its own right]
Dale said:
.. if the speed of sound in a medium were equal to the speed of light in that same medium (I suspect that is not true for any medium) then they would go at the same speed.

That's actually an important point, in the core of neutron stars, the speed of sound increases with the density and provides a limit on the maximum mass. If the speed of sound exceeded the speed of light, there would be frames in which effects preceded causes, thus causality would be violated. That region is shown for example on this plot of various Equations of State as the "Causality Limit".

http://www3.mpifr-bonn.mpg.de/staff/pfreire/images/Graph-R-M-with-pulsars.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
GeorgeDishman said:
If the speed of sound exceeded the speed of light, there would be frames in which effects preceded causes, thus causality would be violated.
In this context the "speed of light" that GeorgeDishman refers to is the universal speed ##c##, the speed of light in a vacuum. It is not the speed at which light propagates through the neutron star material.
 
So wait... What happens if a pulsar is at the causality limit and it absorbs a gas cloud? Does it instantly collapse into a black hole, I notice that there as a gap between the causality limit and the collapse into a black hole.
 
newjerseyrunner said:
So wait... What happens if a pulsar is at the causality limit and it absorbs a gas cloud? Does it instantly collapse into a black hole, I notice that there as a gap between the causality limit and the collapse into a black hole.

A real star can never be "at the causality limit", because that is physically impossible. What that line on the chart means is that if the combination of mass measurement, radius measurement, and equation of state is telling us that the neutron star is at or above that line, then either the measurements are wrong or that equation of state cannot be correct.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: newjerseyrunner

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 77 ·
3
Replies
77
Views
9K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
32K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K