New distance between the Geiger counter and the source

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the new distance between a Geiger counter and a point source of γ-radiation after a change in count rate. Initially, the count rate is 360 s-1 at a distance of 2.0 m, and after 1.5 hours, the count rate drops to 5 s-1. Using the inverse square law and the relationship between count rate and distance, the new distance is determined to be 6 m. The calculations involve the decay formula and the ratios of count rates to distances.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of radioactive decay and half-life, specifically for γ-radiation.
  • Familiarity with the inverse square law as it applies to radiation intensity.
  • Knowledge of exponential decay equations, particularly R = R0 e-λt.
  • Ability to manipulate ratios and proportions in mathematical equations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of the inverse square law in radiation physics.
  • Learn about radioactive decay constants and their calculation methods.
  • Explore the use of Geiger counters and their calibration for accurate radiation measurement.
  • Investigate advanced topics in radiation shielding and safety protocols in handling radioactive materials.
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, radiation safety professionals, and anyone involved in experimental physics or radiation measurement will benefit from this discussion.

moenste
Messages
711
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement


A point source of γ-radiation has a half-life of 30 minutes. The initial count rate, recorded by a Geiger counter placed 2.0 m from the source, is 360 s-1. The distance between the counter and the source is altered. After 1.5 hour the count rate recorded is 5 s-1. What is the new distance between the counter and the source?

Answer: 6 m.

2. The attempt at a solution
We have:
T1 / 2 = 1800 s.
d = 2 m
R = 360 s-1

t = 5400 s
d = ?
R = 5 s-1

No idea what to do here. R = R0 e- λ t, but I don't see a way to find distance from this formula. There is also a formula from the experimental verification of the inverse square law for γ-rays: x = k R- 1 / 2 - c, where d = x + c (distance between actual position of source and effective point of detection), k = constant of proportionality. But I still see not much connection between these two formulas.

Maybe I'm looking in the wrong direction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The inverse square law applies. First determine the new count rate that would be detected at the original distance (if the counter were not moved). Any difference of the actual measured rate from that rate must be due to the change in distance from the source.
 
  • Like
Likes moenste
We seem number of photons will be distributed onto a sphere, If N is number of photons that appears at time t, ##\frac{N}{4\pi r^2}## will be the number of photons that the count rate recorded.
 
  • Like
Likes moenste
gneill said:
First determine the new count rate that would be detected at the original distance (if the counter were not moved).
R = R0 e- λ t = 360 * e- (ln 2 / 1800) * 5400 = 45 s-1?

gneill said:
Any difference of the actual measured rate from that rate must be due to the change in distance from the source.
It looks like the difference is 45 - 5 = 40 s-1.

I also simplified the formula d = k / √ R. Though I've no idea what is k.
 
moenste said:
R = R0 e- λ t = 360 * e- (ln 2 / 1800) * 5400 = 45 s-1?
Good.
It looks like the difference is 45 - 5 = 40 s-1.

I also simplified the formula d = k / √ R. Though I've no idea what is k.

Differences won't help. Use ratios to scale the rate with distance. It's an inverse square law so rate ∝ 1/d2.
 
gneill said:
Differences won't help. Use ratios to scale the rate with distance. It's an inverse square law so rate ∝ 1/d2.
I ∝ 1 / d2
I ∝ 1 / 22
I ∝ 0.25

I still don't the use of it. Maybe you mean 45 s-1 / 2 m = 5 s-1 / d → d = 0.22 m?
 
At intial time, the count rate recorded is R. It means:
$$R=\frac{N_0}{4\pi d^2}$$
The distane d will change into d'. After 1,5h and ##N_0## will change into N. Find the ratio d'/d. You will have the answer
 
  • Like
Likes moenste
Suppose you have a quantity A that varies as the inverse square of the distance d. Then inserting a constant of proportionality k you can write:

##A = \frac{k}{d^2}##

Now if you have two pairs of data, ##(A_1,d_1)## and ##(A_2,d_2)##, then you can write:

##A_1 = \frac{k}{d_1^2}## and ##A_2 = \frac{k}{d_2^2}##

You can then form the ratios:

##\frac{A_2}{A_1} = \frac{\frac{k}{d_2^2}}{\frac{k}{d_2^2}} = \frac{d_1^2}{d_2^2}##

Or, extracting the important relationship:

##\frac{A_2}{A_1} = \frac{d_1^2}{d_2^2}##

If you have a known data pair and one half of another data pair, you can find the "missing" value.
 
  • Like
Likes moenste
Hamal_Arietis said:
$$R=\frac{N_0}{4\pi d^2}$$
Sorry my equation is incorrect.
R is the number of photon that the count rate recorded in 1s. So at the time A point source of γ-radiation has ##N_0## photons. Number of photons that count rate recorded in 1s is:
$$R=\frac{N_0(1-e^{-1.\lambda })}{4\pi d^2}$$
After 1,5h and d change into d'
$$R'=\frac{N(1-e^{-1.\lambda })}{4\pi d'^2}=\frac{N_0.e^{-\lambda t}.(1-e^{-1.\lambda })}{4\pi d'^2}$$

Find the ratio.
 
  • Like
Likes moenste
  • #10
gneill said:
Suppose you have a quantity A that varies as the inverse square of the distance d. Then inserting a constant of proportionality k you can write:

##A = \frac{k}{d^2}##

Now if you have two pairs of data, ##(A_1,d_1)## and ##(A_2,d_2)##, then you can write:

##A_1 = \frac{k}{d_1^2}## and ##A_2 = \frac{k}{d_2^2}##

You can then form the ratios:

##\frac{A_2}{A_1} = \frac{\frac{k}{d_2^2}}{\frac{k}{d_2^2}} = \frac{d_1^2}{d_2^2}##

Or, extracting the important relationship:

##\frac{A_2}{A_1} = \frac{d_1^2}{d_2^2}##

If you have a known data pair and one half of another data pair, you can find the "missing" value.
Get it, just rearrange the equation for k and then substitute in the first equation parts of the second instead of k.

R1 d12 = R2 d22
45 * 22 = 5 * d22
d2 = 6 m.

Thank you!
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K