New Field Theory: Similarities & Differences

[McQueen]

Antonio

It's the energy output from the visible region that i am concerned about. This energy, I don't think can be capable of supplying enough electrical energy to run even an ordinary household light bulb of say 25 watts. The light bulb give off the same light wavelength as the input source so to speak. This is just like a perpetual machine that generate something out of nothing.

It is precisely the energy of this wave-length that makes the whole New Field Theory possible , if the energy of this wave-length (10^-6) is calculated it is seen to be about 1.214 eV . Now this is where it gets interesting because this energy is close to the energy value of an electron which is naturally 1 eV , this means that whatever energy you are talking about when dealing with currents would also apply to New Field Theory. So I can't really see how you can say that the energy won't be enough. In fact it is the present theory which can't correlate energy in the inductive field with actual induced energy , this is one of the proofs of my theory.

 

[Antonio Lao]

The mass of one electron is about half million electron volt (.5 MeV). To derive energy from this mass, it has to be multiplied by the square of its velocity. if this is the drift velocity then the energy is small (calculation not done).

 

[McQueen]

Antonio
“Electron : An elementary particle which is a constituent of all atoms . Its mass is approx. 9.1 x 10 ^-31 Kg. Its charge is 1.6 x 10 ^–19 C. “
It can be seen from this that the charge of the conduction photon . 1.8 x 10 ^–19 C. approximates very closely to that of the electron itself and would therefore fit in very well with all present calculations for calculating of current , voltage etc.,

 

[Antonio Lao]

I don't know how you derived the charge of the conduction photon. I have been taught in school that photon whether real or virtual never has any electric charge. If photon has electric charge then it will interact with anything that it comes in contact with. Then there will be no electromagnetic radiation of any kind. The whole universe would become pitch black and nothing can be seen. Total darkness. The tendency of nature is always to neutralize the electric charge to minimize the electric potential. This neutralization of electric charge is never more pronounce than in lightnings during the life of electrical storms. This neutralization is responsible for the formation of atoms hence the creation of matter as we know it.

 

[McQueen]

I don't know how you derived the charge of the conduction photon. I have been taught in school that photon whether real or virtual never has any electric charge. If photon has electric charge then it will interact with anything that it comes in contact with. Then there will be no electromagnetic radiation of any kind. The whole universe would become pitch black and nothing can be seen.

You are not mistaken , the photon is electrically neutral , instead of the term “charge “ I should have used the term “energy” . Since the photon is the agent of mediation between electrons , its energy is translated into charge , so what I had written is basically correct. The energy of the photon is derived from the equation hc/&lamda.

 

[Antonio Lao]

\frac {hc}{\lambda}

is very similar to what I working on in finding the total energy of the universe. In this form, the energy is purely kinetic.