New guy with a question about a car (with velocity v) and a highway

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mitchell Arnott
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Car Velocity
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a car navigating a curved highway, specifically focusing on the relationship between centripetal force, friction, and the angle of the curve. The original poster attempts to justify the use of a specific formula for calculating the angle of the curve but faces challenges in aligning their reasoning with their teacher's expectations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the validity of using a formula for angle calculation in the context of centripetal force and friction. Questions arise regarding the relationship between the formula and the conditions of the problem, particularly the absence of friction and the nature of the surface.

Discussion Status

Some participants provide guidance on clarifying the forces acting on the car and suggest drawing a free body diagram. There is an acknowledgment of the original poster's uncertainty and the need for further explanation of their reasoning.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted lack of friction in the problem, and the surface is described as not being horizontal. The original poster expresses difficulty in justifying their approach and understanding the material, particularly after discussions with their teacher and the head of the physics department.

Mitchell Arnott
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi all here is the question I need to justify. Please see the attached file with the question.
I would simply like to use the formula (theta)=tan(^-1)[(v^2)/gr] to solve the angle. This gives the correct answer. Now my teacher however solves it using a different vector method and says in order for me to use this in the exam I will need to provide proof that this is an acceptable solution. I have found some stuff online that says; for any object moving at constant velocity on a horizontal surface the centripetal force will be the same as the force of friction. What else can I say to justify this? (My teacher is very stubborn).
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2015-12-14 at 2.38.25 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2015-12-14 at 2.38.25 PM.png
    13.7 KB · Views: 458
Physics news on Phys.org
I moved the thread to the homework forums, as the problem is homework-like.
Mitchell Arnott said:
for any object moving at constant velocity on a horizontal surface the centripetal force will be the same as the force of friction. What else can I say to justify this?
Where is the relation between this statement and the formula you got?
That is the point you have to show.
There is no friction in your problem.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Mitchell Arnott
mfb said:
There is no friction in your problem.
and the surface is not horizontal.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Mitchell Arnott
mfb said:
I moved the thread to the homework forums, as the problem is homework-like.
Where is the relation between this statement and the formula you got?
That is the point you have to show.
There is no friction in your problem.

Yes I agree there is no friction. This I believe is given in the problem itself.
I spoke to the head of the physics department and he basically told me to envision the highway curve as a bowl with the same angle throughout.
I have attached a paper that I wrote to my teacher trying to explain my reasoning for solving the problem as follows and he would not accept it.
I am unsure how to justify using the force at an angle viewing onto the curvature of the highway as a real life solution.
I do not see how it is possible to explain. In fact when I think about it I do not fully comprehend it.
This being that when the head of the department questioned me thoroughly about it I could not answer all of his questions although I thought I understood the material...
It seems I do not. Can someone help me? My test is on wednesday night and I would really like to be able to solve this problem.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1174.JPG
    IMG_1174.JPG
    33.8 KB · Views: 435
haruspex said:
and the surface is not horizontal.
Agreed please see my response below and see if you can comment some help.
 
Mitchell Arnott said:
Yes I agree there is no friction. This I believe is given in the problem itself.
I spoke to the head of the physics department and he basically told me to envision the highway curve as a bowl with the same angle throughout.
I have attached a paper that I wrote to my teacher trying to explain my reasoning for solving the problem as follows and he would not accept it.
I am unsure how to justify using the force at an angle viewing onto the curvature of the highway as a real life solution.
I do not see how it is possible to explain. In fact when I think about it I do not fully comprehend it.
This being that when the head of the department questioned me thoroughly about it I could not answer all of his questions although I thought I understood the material...
It seems I do not. Can someone help me? My test is on wednesday night and I would really like to be able to solve this problem.
The attachment is rather hard to read, and the logic flow unclear. You don't need all that verbiage, just a few comments to provide the basis of your equations and the manipulations.
Explaining what you are doing, write out the ##\Sigma F=ma## equations, as they apply to this problem, in each of the horizontal and vertical directions. Then solve.
 
I use force equals mass times acceleration wouldn't I be just using trigonometry to calculate the angle of the triangles using The horizontal and vertical components? I see what you're saying that the acceleration is gravity . I will try to formulate a paper with those equations soon .
 
Have you drawn a free body diagram of the car yet and shown the forces acting on it? This should be your first step. So please articulate what the forces are that are acting on the car.
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K