New Insight into the Chemistry of Solvents

  • Thread starter Thread starter jedishrfu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chemistry Physics
AI Thread Summary
Recent research from the University of Oxford challenges the traditional physics principle that states "opposite charges attract and like charges repel." The study, published in Nature Nanotechnology, reveals that like-charged particles can attract each other when submerged in certain solvents, depending on the solvent's properties and the charge type. However, participants in the discussion express skepticism about the findings, suggesting that the headline may be misleading. They clarify that while the particles still exhibit repulsion, the solvent plays a significant role in facilitating their attraction. Concerns are raised about the reliability of published research, with some likening the claims to pseudoscientific concepts like homeopathy. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the complexity of particle interactions in different environments while questioning the interpretation of the study's results.
Messages
15,438
Reaction score
10,137
TL;DR Summary
The notion of opposite charges attract and like repel has to be modified when dealing with certain types of solvents where like charges may group together.
https://www.newsweek.com/basic-principle-physics-wrong-oxford-university-scientists-say-1874984

Opposites charges attract; like charges repel" is a long-held fundamental principle of physics that you might have heard at school, but your teacher may have been wrong.

Researchers from the University of Oxford's chemistry department found that like-charged particles submerged in solutions were able to attract each other from long distances, depending on the solvent used and the sign of the charge.

...

The study has been published in the journal Nature Nanotechnology.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
I must admit I'm as skeptic as @Bystander. To be honest it almost sounds to me like homeopathy. Then again what do I know...?

Being published in a respected journal is no guarantee anymore, is it? Was it ever?

EDIT: Then again I could of course have read the article before proffering my meaning, I apologize.
 
Last edited:
The headline and claim that opposites don't always attract is clickbait. The particles still exhibit repulsive force. The solvent is doing it's own work and bringing them together.
 
sbrothy said:
I must admit I'm as skeptic as @Bystander. To be honest it almost sounds to me like homeopathy. Then again what do I know...?

Being published in a respected journal is no guarantee anymore, is it? Was it ever?

EDIT: Then again I could of course have read the article before proffering my meaning, I apologize.
It's clickbait. You didn't miss anything in the article. In a particular solvent, it is more energetically favorable for the solvent to move like charges closer together. The charges are still repelling each other, of course.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes hajonnes and sbrothy
If you consider the electron gas as a solvent for the positive ionic cores in a metal, the Cooper mechanism in superconductors is just of this form
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top