New review on decoherence by Schlosshauer

In summary, the review discusses the role of decoherence in the foundations of quantum mechanics, and how it cannot address the measurement problem on its own. It is written in a general and interpretation-independent way, and new information is included in section 7.3 on the relation to Bohr's view.
  • #1
A. Neumaier
Science Advisor
Insights Author
8,611
4,645
TL;DR Summary
On decoherence and its relevance for the measurement problem
I'd like to draw attention to the recent survey
  • M. Schlosshauer, Quantum decoherence, Physics Reports (2019). Available online 18 October 2019
Maximilian Schlosshauer said:
One of the central topics in the foundations of quantum mechanics is known as the quantum measurement problem, and in Sec. 7.1 below we will discuss whether decoherence has anything of substance to say about it. In Sec. 7.2, we will then briefly review the role that decoherence plays, or may play, in the various interpretations of quantum mechanics. In Sec. 7.3, we will comment on Niels Bohr’s views on the primacy of classical concepts and their relationship to the quantum–classical correspondence described by decoherence.
In Section 7.1 said:
for the kinds of entangled quantum states produced by decoherence-type interactions to be interpreted as describing a situation in which the system becomes “classical,” we need to take the existence of measurement outcomes as a priori given, or otherwise give an account outside of decoherence of how measurement outcomes are produced, because the property of classicality is ultimately a statement about measurement statistics. Thus decoherence, by itself, cannot address the measurement problem in any substantial way.
Of course, to say that decoherence has no bearing on the measurement problem—or on any of the “big” foundational problems in general—is not to suggest that decoherence and its underlying ideas cannot be of relevance in the investigation of fundamental questions. [...] the ability of decoherence to dynamically define preferred bases is exploited in certain interpretations of quantum mechanics
 
  • Like
Likes gentzen, msumm21, eloheim and 3 others
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Is there anything new in this review in comparison with his older review on decoherence and his book?
 
  • #3
Demystifier said:
Is there anything new in this review in comparison with his older review on decoherence and his book?
It is carefully written to be interpretation-independent:
Maximilian Schlosshauer (p.3) said:
Stated in general and interpretation-neutral terms, decoherence describes how entangling interactions with the environment influence the statistics of future measurements on the system.
Section 7.3 on the relation to Bohr's view is also new.
 

Similar threads

  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
2
Replies
49
Views
2K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
7
Views
999
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
25
Views
1K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
2
Views
999
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
3
Replies
76
Views
5K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
7
Views
925
Back
Top