New review on decoherence by Schlosshauer

  • #1
A. Neumaier
Science Advisor
Insights Author
2019 Award
7,476
3,377

Summary:

On decoherence and its relevance for the measurement problem
I'd like to draw attention to the recent survey
  • M. Schlosshauer, Quantum decoherence, Physics Reports (2019). Available online 18 October 2019
Maximilian Schlosshauer said:
One of the central topics in the foundations of quantum mechanics is known as the quantum measurement problem, and in Sec. 7.1 below we will discuss whether decoherence has anything of substance to say about it. In Sec. 7.2, we will then briefly review the role that decoherence plays, or may play, in the various interpretations of quantum mechanics. In Sec. 7.3, we will comment on Niels Bohr’s views on the primacy of classical concepts and their relationship to the quantum–classical correspondence described by decoherence.
In Section 7.1 said:
for the kinds of entangled quantum states produced by decoherence-type interactions to be interpreted as describing a situation in which the system becomes “classical,” we need to take the existence of measurement outcomes as a priori given, or otherwise give an account outside of decoherence of how measurement outcomes are produced, because the property of classicality is ultimately a statement about measurement statistics. Thus decoherence, by itself, cannot address the measurement problem in any substantial way.
Of course, to say that decoherence has no bearing on the measurement problem—or on any of the “big” foundational problems in general—is not to suggest that decoherence and its underlying ideas cannot be of relevance in the investigation of fundamental questions. [...] the ability of decoherence to dynamically define preferred bases is exploited in certain interpretations of quantum mechanics
 
  • Like
Likes msumm21, eloheim, kith and 2 others

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Demystifier
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
11,005
3,718
Is there anything new in this review in comparison with his older review on decoherence and his book?
 
  • #3
A. Neumaier
Science Advisor
Insights Author
2019 Award
7,476
3,377
Is there anything new in this review in comparison with his older review on decoherence and his book?
It is carefully written to be interpretation-independent:
Maximilian Schlosshauer (p.3) said:
Stated in general and interpretation-neutral terms, decoherence describes how entangling interactions with the environment influence the statistics of future measurements on the system.
Section 7.3 on the relation to Bohr's view is also new.
 

Related Threads on New review on decoherence by Schlosshauer

  • Last Post
Replies
9
Views
927
  • Last Post
Replies
21
Views
1K
Replies
92
Views
10K
Replies
2
Views
999
Replies
23
Views
685
Replies
7
Views
378
Replies
14
Views
238
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
622
Top