Undergrad New scientist SU(5) Unification without Proton Decay

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on a paper published in New Scientist that presents a four-dimensional SU(5) grand unified theory (GUT) where protons remain stable, diverging from traditional models that predict proton decay. The authors, Bartosz Fornal and Benjamin Grinstein, propose that the Standard Model leptons and quarks are assigned to specific irreducible representations of SU(5), with the gauge symmetry broken by scalar fields. This model satisfies current experimental constraints without requiring fine-tuning, making it a significant advancement in GUT research. The paper has garnered positive feedback from particle physicists, highlighting its potential as a promising modification of SU(5) GUT without supersymmetry. Overall, the findings suggest a feasible path for constructing a GUT that avoids proton decay while adhering to established physics principles.
kodama
Messages
1,083
Reaction score
144
new scientist latest issue covers this paper

SU(5) Unification without Proton Decay
Bartosz Fornal, Benjamin Grinstein
(Submitted on 26 Jun 2017 (v1), last revised 13 Nov 2017 (this version, v2))
We construct a four-dimensional SU(5) grand unified theory in which the proton is stable. The Standard Model leptons reside in the 5 and 10 irreps of SU(5), whereas the quarks live in the 40 and 50 irreps. The SU(5) gauge symmetry is broken by the vacuum expectation values of the scalar 24 and 75 irreps. All non-Standard Model fields are heavy. Stability of the proton requires three relations between the parameters of the model to hold. However, abandoning the requirement of absolute proton stability, the model fulfills current experimental constraints without fine-tuning.
Comments: 5 pages; v2: accepted by Physical Review Letters
Subjects: High Energy Physics - Phenomenology (hep-ph); High Energy Physics - Theory (hep-th)
Cite as: arXiv:1706.08535 [hep-ph]
(or arXiv:1706.08535v2 [hep-ph] for this version)

with some reviews and quotes by particle HEP physicists that its promising. a modification of SU(5) GUT, without SUSY, that makes protons stable.
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier, ohwilleke and Urs Schreiber
Physics news on Phys.org
Good catch.
 
  • Like
Likes kodama
ohwilleke said:
Good catch.

what do you think is the significance of this paper's theory? SU(5) GUT without proton decay or SUSY?
 
That it's possible to construct a GUT with a simple gauge group that does not have proton decay. Lower limits on the proton's mean life are getting high enough to be able to test various GUT's.

I decided to put my Semisimple Lie Algebras software to work to see what is plausible. I'll give the highest-weight values of the irreps and also their Standard-Model breakdowns as (QCD,WIS,WHC).
Leptons:
5 - (1,0,0,0) - (3*,1,1/3) + (1,2,-1/2)
10 - (0,1,0,0) - (3,1,2/3) + (3*,2,-1/6) + (1,1,-1)
10* - (0,0,1,0) - (3*,1,-2/3) + (3,2,1/6) + (1,1,1)
5* - (0,0,0,1) - (3/1,-1/3) + (1,2,1/2)
Right-handed neutrinos are Standard-Model and SU(5) singlets.
Quarks:
40 - (1,1,0,0) - (8,1,1) + (6*,2,1/6) + (3,2,1/6) + (3*,3,-2/3) + (3*,1,-2/3) + (1,2,-3/2)
40* - (0,0,1,1) - (8,1,-1) + (6,2,-1/6) + (3*,2,-1/6) + (3,3,2/3) + (3,1,2/3) + (1,2,3/2)
50 - (0,2,0,0) - (6*,3,-1/3) + (6,1,4/3) + (8,2,1/2) + (3*,2,-7/6) + (3,1,-1/3) + (1,1,-2)
50* - (0,0,2,0) - (6,3,1/3) + (6*,1,-4/3) + (8,2,-1/2) + (3,2,7/6) + (3*,1,1/3) + (1,1,2)
Scalars:
24 - (1,0,0,1) - (8,1,0) + (1,3,0) + (1,1,0) + (3*,2,5/6) + (3,2,-5/6)
75 - (0,1,1,0) - (8,3,0) + (8,1,0) + (1,1,0) + (6*,2,-5/6) + (6,2,5/6) + (3*,2,5/6) + (3,2,-5/6) + (3*,1,-5/3) + (3,1,5/3)

Thus, 5: left-handed lepton, 10: right-handed electron, 40: left-handed quark, right-handed up, 50: right-handed down, along with oodles of other particles that get GUT-scale masses from symmetry breaking.

Checking on a (fermion).(fermion).(scalar) sort of coupling, I find that all of them couple with the 24, and that all but the 5 couple with the 75.
 
"Supernovae evidence for foundational change to cosmological models" https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.15143 The paper claims: We compare the standard homogeneous cosmological model, i.e., spatially flat ΛCDM, and the timescape cosmology which invokes backreaction of inhomogeneities. Timescape, while statistically homogeneous and isotropic, departs from average Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker evolution, and replaces dark energy by kinetic gravitational energy and its gradients, in explaining...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
9K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
10K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 74 ·
3
Replies
74
Views
11K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K