Undergrad New Way of Particle Accelerating?

Click For Summary
Current particle accelerators can achieve speeds close to the speed of light, contrary to the claim that they only reach 0.16c. The use of magnetic fields to control the direction of emitted electrons from radioactive substances is limited, as their initial motion is random and cannot be effectively focused. While it is theoretically possible for decay products from two radioactive sources to collide, the likelihood of such events occurring naturally is extremely low compared to collisions generated in accelerators. Additionally, the Quantum Zeno effect does not enhance the probability of particle decay in this context. Overall, the proposed methods for increasing efficiency and collision rates are not feasible with current understanding and technology.
BenjaminLovesQM
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Question 1:
Current particle accelerators are only able to speed up particles up to around 0.16c. However, in nuclear reactors, radioactive nuclei release subatomic particles, i.e. electrons, at more than 0.75c. To increase efficiency and perhaps to observe how particles collide at high speeds, would it be possible to use a magnetic field to control the direction of the emitted electrons by radioactive substances? Where we put two identical radioactive particles in the particle accelerator (i.e. Ra-228), such that the half lives are equal. When they emit radiation, can we alter their random emission direction by applying a magnetic field, so that the particles collide?Question 2:
To ensure a higher chance of radiation emission, can we use the Quantum Zeno effect, to increase the chance for which particles decay?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
BenjaminLovesQM said:
Current particle accelerators are only able to speed up particles up to around 0.16c.
This is not correct. LHC protons travel very close to the speed of light with ##c-v \simeq m^2c^5/(2E^2)##. This is slightly more than 1 m/s or ##4.5\cdot 10^{-9}c##.
 
Oh ok, sorry for the wrong info. But I'd like to ask: would the method work? Thanks!
 
Orodruin said:
This is slightly more than 1 m/s or 4.5⋅10−9c4.5\cdot 10^{-9}c.
...less than ##c##? (i.e. ##v \approx c - 1~\rm{m/s}##)
 
jtbell said:
...less than ##c##? (i.e. ##v \approx c - 1~\rm{m/s}##)
Well, the quantity I quoted was ##c-v## so if that is positive ##v < c##. Alternatively, ##v \simeq 0.999999995c##.
 
D'oh... the connection slipped past me there. :oops:
 
Right, so would this method work? Driven by curiosity...
 
BenjaminLovesQM said:
Right, so would this method work? Driven by curiosity...

I'm not sure I fully understand your question, because the issue has been rather obvious.

We steer charge particles using magnetic field. That is why there is such a thing as "bending magnets". It is what we used to steer and control the direction of particles in accelerators. In fact, we use magnets of different configurations to bend, focus, steer, etc... these particles.

So I don't know exactly if this is what you didn't know before, or if I'm missing something else.

And BTW, "waiting" for particles to be emitted is a very inefficient way to have a particle source for particle accelerators. Also note that for electrons, it takes almost no effort to get it close, VERY close, to "c". All the physics that we use to model particle beams simply uses "c" as the speed of electrons once it achieves MeV energy scale. This is easily achieved just from electrons coming out of a photoinjector already without having them pass through any additional accelerating structures.

Zz.
 
BenjaminLovesQM said:
would it be possible to use a magnetic field to control the direction of the emitted electrons by radioactive substances?
You cannot. You can change their direction once they got emitted, but you cannot properly focus radioactive decay products due to their random initial motion.

While it is possible to have decay products from two sources collide, the probability is utterly negligible. You would probably have to wait for years to accumulate a few collisions, something particle accelerators can deliver in seconds (at much higher collision energies).
BenjaminLovesQM said:
To ensure a higher chance of radiation emission, can we use the Quantum Zeno effect, to increase the chance for which particles decay?
You cannot.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K