B Newton's Constant in Higher Dim. Spacetimes, Velocity of Light=1

Click For Summary
Setting the velocity of light to unity, the discussion explores the implications of Newton's constant in higher-dimensional spacetimes. It highlights that while the curvature scalar's dimension remains constant, the matter Lagrangian's dimension changes with the number of dimensions, leading to a different dimension for Newton's constant in non-four-dimensional spaces. The modified form of Newton's Law of Gravity in d-dimensional space is presented, showing how it relates to Laplace-Poisson's equation. By equating gravitational force with Newton's Second Law, the derived dimension of G in MKS units is discussed. The conversation references relevant literature for further exploration of these concepts.
gerald V
Messages
66
Reaction score
3
TL;DR
In our spacetime, Newtons constant has dimension length/energy (the velocity of light set unity). How is this in a different number of dimensions?
In the following, I set the velocity of light unity.
I refer to theories of gravities in higher-dimensional spacetimes.

Newton` s constant converts the curvature scalar with dimension ##lenght^{-2}## into the matter Lagrangian with dimension ##energy/length^3##. So its dimension is ##length/energy##. But in ##d##-dimensional spacetime the dimension of the curvature scalar would remain unchanged, whereas the matter Lagrangian would have dimension ##energy/length^{d-1}##. So, for ##d \ne 4##, Newtons constant would have a different dimension. Is this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In d-dimensional space, Newton's Law of Gravity would be F_g=\displaystyle G\frac{m_1m_2}{r^{d-1}}
(which follows from Laplace-Poisson's equation in d-dimensions).
By equating that with Newton's Second Law, which is taken to be dimensionally-independent,
we get
in MKS units, for d-dimensional space, [G]=\displaystyle \frac{1}{kg} m^d s^{-2}.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_constant

See: J.D. Barrow's
(1983) Dimensionality
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London.
Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences 310: 337–346 http://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1983.0095
(See also https://www.jstor.org/stable/37418 )

It seems this following blog summarizes some of the details:
https://thespectrumofriemannium.wordpress.com/2012/11/18/log054-barrow-units/
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and etotheipi
Moderator's note: Spin-off from another thread due to topic change. In the second link referenced, there is a claim about a physical interpretation of frame field. Consider a family of observers whose worldlines fill a region of spacetime. Each of them carries a clock and a set of mutually orthogonal rulers. Each observer points in the (timelike) direction defined by its worldline's tangent at any given event along it. What about the rulers each of them carries ? My interpretation: each...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
6K
Replies
130
Views
14K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K