Newton's formula for the sums of powers of roots?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Clara Chung
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula Roots Sums
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the division of a polynomial function, specifically f(x) = a_0 x^n + a_1 x^{n-1} + ... + a_n, by the linear factor x - α_j. The method involves rewriting the polynomial in a way that facilitates the division, ensuring that each term is multiplied by (x - α_j). The final result of the division is expressed as a polynomial of degree n-1, confirming that the division process effectively eliminates the root α_j from the equation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of polynomial functions and their properties
  • Familiarity with the fundamental theorem of algebra
  • Knowledge of polynomial division techniques
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
NEXT STEPS
  • Study polynomial long division methods in detail
  • Explore the implications of the fundamental theorem of algebra on polynomial roots
  • Learn about synthetic division as an alternative to polynomial division
  • Investigate the applications of polynomial factorization in solving equations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying algebra, and educators looking to deepen their understanding of polynomial functions and division techniques.

Clara Chung
Messages
300
Reaction score
13
Please take a look of the photo. In the middle part, it says For each I, by division and gets the following results. Please further explain to me how to get the result by division. The photo is attached.

Attempt: 1. Using f(x)=α0(x-α1)(x-α2)...(x-αn) form. If it is divided by x-αi , there should be no αi occurs in the results.
2. Using fundamental theorem of algebra. a1/a0=α1+α2+α3+α4+..+αn, αi is lost so it is (a1-a0αi)x^(n-2),not(a1+a0αi)x^(n-2), so this is not the method. Then how should i divide it? Please help
 

Attachments

  • img026.jpg
    img026.jpg
    27.9 KB · Views: 603
Physics news on Phys.org
The definition of f(x) is this:

f(x) = a_0 x^n + a_1 x^{n-1} + ... + a_n

We want to divide by x-\alpha_j. To make this easy, let's rewrite the first term as follows:

a_0 x^n = a_0 x \cdot x^{n-1} = a_0 (x-\alpha_j + \alpha_j) \cdot x^{n-1} = a_0(x-\alpha_j) x^{n-1} + a_0 \alpha_j x^{n-1}

The term a_0 \alpha_j x^{n-1} is of order x^{n-1}, so it can be combined with the term a_1 x^{n-1}. So f(x) can be written as:

f(x) = a_0 (x-\alpha_j) x^{n-1} + [a_0 \alpha_j + a_1] x^{n-1} + a_2 x^{n-2} + ...

We can similarly rewrite the second term:

[a_0 \alpha_j + a_1] x^{n-1} = [a_0 \alpha_j + a_1](x - \alpha_j) \cdot x^{n-2} + [a_0 \alpha_j + a_1]\alpha_j x^{n-2}

The second term, [a_0 \alpha_j + a_1]\alpha_j x^{n-2}, can be combined with the term a_2 x^{n-2}. So we can rewrite f(x) yet again as:

f(x) = a_0 (x-\alpha_j) x^{n-1} + [a_0 \alpha_j + a_1] (x-\alpha_j) x^{n-2} + [[a_0 \alpha_j + a_1]\alpha_j + a_2] x^{n-2} + ...
= a_0 (x-\alpha_j) x^{n-1} + [a_0 \alpha_j + a_1] (x-\alpha_j) x^{n-2} + [a_0 (\alpha_j)^2 + a_1 \alpha_j + a_2] x^{n-2} + ...

You can continue this pattern to get:

f(x) = a_0 (x-\alpha_j) x^{n-1} + [a_0 \alpha_j + a_1] (x-\alpha_j) x^{n-2} + [a_0 (\alpha_j)^2 + a_1 \alpha_j + a_2] (x-\alpha_j) x^{n-3} + ... + [a_0 (\alpha_j)^{n-1} + a_1 (\alpha_j)^{n-2} + a_2 (\alpha_j)^{n-3} + ... + a_{n-1}](x-\alpha_j) x^0 + [a_0 (\alpha_j)^n + a_1 (\alpha_j)^{n-1} + a_2 (\alpha_j)^{n-2} + ... + a_n](x-\alpha_j) x^{-1}

The very last term is zero, because we have the coefficient:
[a_0 (\alpha_j)^n + a_1 (\alpha_j)^{n-1} + a_2 (\alpha_j)^{n-2} + ... + a_n]

which is just equal to f(\alpha_j). By definition, \alpha_j is one of the zeros of f(x). So we can ignore the last term, to get:

f(x) = a_0 (x-\alpha_j) x^{n-1} + [a_0 \alpha_j + a_1] (x-\alpha_j) x^{n-2} + [a_0 (\alpha_j)^2 + a_1 \alpha_j + a_2] (x-\alpha_j) x^{n-3} + ... + [a_0 (\alpha_j)^{n-1} + a_1 (\alpha_j)^{n-2} + a_2 (\alpha_j)^{n-3} + ... + a_{n-1}](x-\alpha_j) x^0

Now having rewritten f(x) in this way, we can easily divide by x-\alpha_j, since every term is multiplied by that. So we get:

\frac{f(x)}{x-\alpha_j} = a_0 x^{n-1} + [a_0 \alpha_j + a_1] x^{n-2} + [a_0 (\alpha_j)^2 + a_1 \alpha_j + a_2] x^{n-3} + ... + [a_0 (\alpha_j)^{n-1} + a_1 (\alpha_j)^{n-2} + a_2 (\alpha_j)^{n-3} + ... + a_{n-1}] x^0
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Clara Chung
stevendaryl said:
The definition of f(x) is this:

f(x) = a_0 x^n + a_1 x^{n-1} + ... + a_n

We want to divide by x-\alpha_j. To make this easy, let's rewrite the first term as follows:

a_0 x^n = a_0 x \cdot x^{n-1} = a_0 (x-\alpha_j + \alpha_j) \cdot x^{n-1} = a_0(x-\alpha_j) x^{n-1} + a_0 \alpha_j x^{n-1}

The term a_0 \alpha_j x^{n-1} is of order x^{n-1}, so it can be combined with the term a_1 x^{n-1}. So f(x) can be written as:

f(x) = a_0 (x-\alpha_j) x^{n-1} + [a_0 \alpha_j + a_1] x^{n-1} + a_2 x^{n-2} + ...

We can similarly rewrite the second term:

[a_0 \alpha_j + a_1] x^{n-1} = [a_0 \alpha_j + a_1](x - \alpha_j) \cdot x^{n-2} + [a_0 \alpha_j + a_1]\alpha_j x^{n-2}

The second term, [a_0 \alpha_j + a_1]\alpha_j x^{n-2}, can be combined with the term a_2 x^{n-2}. So we can rewrite f(x) yet again as:

f(x) = a_0 (x-\alpha_j) x^{n-1} + [a_0 \alpha_j + a_1] (x-\alpha_j) x^{n-2} + [[a_0 \alpha_j + a_1]\alpha_j + a_2] x^{n-2} + ...
= a_0 (x-\alpha_j) x^{n-1} + [a_0 \alpha_j + a_1] (x-\alpha_j) x^{n-2} + [a_0 (\alpha_j)^2 + a_1 \alpha_j + a_2] x^{n-2} + ...

You can continue this pattern to get:

f(x) = a_0 (x-\alpha_j) x^{n-1} + [a_0 \alpha_j + a_1] (x-\alpha_j) x^{n-2} + [a_0 (\alpha_j)^2 + a_1 \alpha_j + a_2] (x-\alpha_j) x^{n-3} + ... + [a_0 (\alpha_j)^{n-1} + a_1 (\alpha_j)^{n-2} + a_2 (\alpha_j)^{n-3} + ... + a_{n-1}](x-\alpha_j) x^0 + [a_0 (\alpha_j)^n + a_1 (\alpha_j)^{n-1} + a_2 (\alpha_j)^{n-2} + ... + a_n](x-\alpha_j) x^{-1}

The very last term is zero, because we have the coefficient:
[a_0 (\alpha_j)^n + a_1 (\alpha_j)^{n-1} + a_2 (\alpha_j)^{n-2} + ... + a_n]

which is just equal to f(\alpha_j). By definition, \alpha_j is one of the zeros of f(x). So we can ignore the last term, to get:

f(x) = a_0 (x-\alpha_j) x^{n-1} + [a_0 \alpha_j + a_1] (x-\alpha_j) x^{n-2} + [a_0 (\alpha_j)^2 + a_1 \alpha_j + a_2] (x-\alpha_j) x^{n-3} + ... + [a_0 (\alpha_j)^{n-1} + a_1 (\alpha_j)^{n-2} + a_2 (\alpha_j)^{n-3} + ... + a_{n-1}](x-\alpha_j) x^0

Now having rewritten f(x) in this way, we can easily divide by x-\alpha_j, since every term is multiplied by that. So we get:

\frac{f(x)}{x-\alpha_j} = a_0 x^{n-1} + [a_0 \alpha_j + a_1] x^{n-2} + [a_0 (\alpha_j)^2 + a_1 \alpha_j + a_2] x^{n-3} + ... + [a_0 (\alpha_j)^{n-1} + a_1 (\alpha_j)^{n-2} + a_2 (\alpha_j)^{n-3} + ... + a_{n-1}] x^0
Thanks for solving the problem that perplexed me so long. The answer is very clear.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K