Newton's Laws Conceptual Problem

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of thrust reversers in commercial aircraft, specifically addressing a conceptual problem regarding their functionality. The correct answers to the question posed are B, C, and D, as thrust reversers can indeed aid in vertical takeoff and deceleration. The participant's confusion arose from the interpretation of acceleration in the context of thrust direction, highlighting a potential flaw in the problem's wording. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding thrust dynamics in aviation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's Laws of Motion
  • Familiarity with jet propulsion mechanics
  • Knowledge of thrust reverser systems in aviation
  • Basic principles of acceleration and velocity
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mechanics of thrust reversers in commercial aircraft
  • Study Newton's Laws of Motion in the context of aviation
  • Explore the implications of thrust direction on aircraft performance
  • Investigate safety mechanisms associated with thrust reversers
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, aviation students, and anyone interested in the principles of aircraft propulsion and performance optimization.

JSmithDawg
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


"Normally, jet engines push air out the back of the engine, resulting in forward thrust, but commercial aircraft often have thrust reversers that can change the direction of the ejected air, sending it forward."

"When might thrust reversers be useful in practice? (Chose all that apply)
a) If the ejected air is directed forward then thrust force is backward. This might be desirable to conserve the speed of the plane.
b) If the ejected air is directed downward, the thrust force is up. Jets can take off vertically without needing a runway this way.
c) If the ejected air is directed forward then thrust force is backward. This might be desirable to accelerate the plane.
d) If the ejected air is directed forward then thrust force is backward. This might be desirable to slow the plane down. "

The Attempt at a Solution


A - No. If thrust is moving a plane forward, then it reversing the direction of the thrust should slow it down rather than conserve the speed
B - Yes. The thrust should allow the jet to rise even though it's not on a runway
C - Yes. This will cause the plane to change velocity, which'll change acceleration
D - Yes. If a plan. If thrust is moving the plane forward, then reversing the thrust will cause the plane to slow down.

My Answer: B,C,D, but the website told me I was wrong and didn't provide me any feedback. What am I doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem writer probably wasn't as clever as you when considering C. In some situations the desire might well be to slow the plane's forward speed (a negative acceleration is still an acceleration). The problem writer may have (mistakenly) considered the phrase "desirable to accelerate the plane" to mean only speed it up in the forward direction. This is an error in the problem, not an error on your part. So, it's likely that your "C = True" answer is your culprit. Your other choices look okay to me.
 
I would agree with "C = True" if it weren't for this (bold by me). "... but commercial aircraft often have thrust ..."

Actually using it while in flight would probably have similar results as:

_503780_reverse_thrust5.gif


Thrust reversers can use a variety of safety locks to prevent the system from accidentally deploying, including sensors and switches to check that the aircraft is actually landing at a low speed.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/503780.stm
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 117 ·
4
Replies
117
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K