Newton's second law and how to calculate the force on the mo

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on applying Newton's second law, F=ma, to calculate the force acting on objects in the moon's gravitational field, which is approximately 1.622 m/s². A participant proposed a generalized formula, F=m(g/6), to simplify calculations for potential future lunar inhabitants. The conversation highlights the importance of redefining gravitational acceleration (g) based on the celestial body in question, emphasizing the use of Newton's law of gravitation, F=GMm/R², for accurate calculations. Participants concluded that expressing lunar gravity in terms of Earth's gravity is feasible through the relationship g_Moon/g_Earth.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's second law (F=ma)
  • Familiarity with gravitational acceleration concepts
  • Knowledge of Newton's law of gravitation (F=GMm/R²)
  • Basic mathematical skills for manipulating formulas
NEXT STEPS
  • Research how to derive gravitational acceleration for different celestial bodies using Newton's law of gravitation.
  • Explore the implications of varying gravitational forces on human physiology and engineering for lunar habitation.
  • Study the relationship between mass, radius, and gravitational acceleration in planetary science.
  • Learn about the practical applications of gravitational calculations in space missions and exploration.
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, aerospace engineers, and anyone interested in the practical applications of gravitational laws in extraterrestrial environments.

Farhad-.-
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
I, earlier were studying Newton's second law F=ma, or rather the free fall of objects, F=mg.
A thought occurred to me, how do I apply this formula to the moon with the Gravity of 1.622m/^2 and came up with F=m(g/6), however, g/6 = 1.63m/s^2

Normally I'd just use F=ma, but assuming people one day would live there, they'd use g = 1.622m/s^2, which I think many would find confusing. So I tried to make a generalized formula. Is there any way to improve upon the formula?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Farhad-.- said:
I, earlier were studying Newton's second law F=ma, or rather the free fall of objects, F=mg.
A thought occurred to me, how do I apply this formula to the moon with the Gravity of 1.622m/^2 and came up with F=m(g/6), however, g/6 = 1.63m/s^2

Normally I'd just use F=ma, but assuming people one day would live there, they'd use g = 1.622m/s^2, which I think many would find confusing. So I tried to make a generalized formula. Is there any way to improve upon the formula?

What do you mean "apply it to the moon"? Do you mean objects falling on the moon, or the moon-Earth system?
 
Student100 said:
What do you mean "apply it to the moon"? Do you mean objects falling on the moon, or the moon-Earth system?
Objects falling towards the moon*
 
Farhad-.- said:
Objects falling towards the moon*

Simply redefine g. That's all that needs to be done.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Thewindyfan
Student100 said:
Simply redefine g. That's all that needs to be done.
Yeah, but what I was asking is there any way to use Earth's gravity as a template without actually redefining g, which now I think about, I did not specify, I got the formula f=m(g/6). But is there a better way of doing it? My formula skills aren't that great :/
 
Farhad-.- said:
Yeah, but what I was asking is there any way to use Earth's gravity as a template without actually redefining g, which now I think about, I did not specify

Why not use Newton's law of gravitation in that case?

$$F=\frac{Gm_1m_2}{r^2}$$

Although, g in F=mg is just a dummy variable, it doesn't have an intrinsic meaning until we give it one, so I'm not really understanding where you're going.
 
Student100 said:
Why not use Newton's law of gravitation in that case?

$$F=\frac{GMm}{R^2}$$
We are going through that in friday, I have a basic concept of how to use that but not indept unfortunately.
 
Farhad-.- said:
We are going through that in friday, I have a basic concept of how to use that but not indept unfortunately.

It doesn't use Earth as a template either, (not sure why you'd want to), it uses the nature of the system and the gravitational constant.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Farhad-.-
Free fall acceleration on Earth is just ##g=G\frac{M_{Earth}}{R^2_{Earth}}##, here ##M_{Earth}## is Earth mass, and ##R_{Earth}## - its radius. For Moon you get ##g=G\frac{M_{Moon}}{R^2_{Moon}}##. Now if you want to express free fall acceleration for Moon in terms of Earth g you just need to take relation ##g_{Moon}/g_{Earth}##. So you will get ##g_{Moon}=\frac{M_{Moon}}{M_{Earth}}\frac{R^2_{Earth}}{R^2_{Moon}}g_{Earth}##
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Farhad-.-
  • #10
Domullus said:
Free fall acceleration on Earth is just ##g=G\frac{M_{Earth}}{R^2_{Earth}}##, here ##M_{Earth}## is Earth mass, and ##R_{Earth}## - its radius. For Moon you get just ##g=G\frac{M_{Moon}}{R^2_{Moon}}##. Now if you want to express free fall acceleration for Moon in terms of Earth g you just need to take relation ##g_{Moon}/g_{Earth}##. So you will get ##g_{Moon}=\frac{M_{Moon}}{M_{Earth}}\frac{R^2_{Earth}}{R^2_{Moon}}g_{Earth}##
It's interesting that the formula for the gravitational acceleration at or above the surface is true, even if the density of the planet varies with depth (i.e a massive iron core or shell) It's just the total mass and the radius that count. It makes life a lot simpler :smile:.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Farhad-.-
  • #11
sophiecentaur said:
It's interesting that the formula for the gravitational acceleration at or above the surface is true, even if the density of the planet varies with depth (i.e a massive iron core or shell) It's just the total mass and the radius that count. It makes life a lot simpler :smile:.
Yeah I know, I had the same thought when I was thinking about it ^•^
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
8K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K