NextNano3 simulation and some physics help

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ingeni
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics Simulation
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the use of NextNano3 for simulating InP nanowires with three-sided gates. The user aims to manipulate the doping levels to position the Fermi level within the potential wells created by the gates. Key distinctions between ohmic contacts and Schottky barriers are highlighted, with ohmic contacts being preferred for easier voltage application, while Schottky barriers allow for adjustable barrier heights. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding these contact types for optimizing gated dot configurations within nanowires.

PREREQUISITES
  • NextNano3 simulation software
  • Understanding of InP nanowire physics
  • Knowledge of doping effects on semiconductor properties
  • Familiarity with electrical contacts: ohmic and Schottky barriers
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the impact of doping on Fermi level positioning in semiconductors
  • Learn about the configuration of ohmic contacts in semiconductor devices
  • Explore the principles of Schottky barrier formation and its applications
  • Investigate advanced features of NextNano3 for simulating different boundary conditions
USEFUL FOR

Researchers and engineers in semiconductor physics, particularly those working with nanowire technology and electrical contact design. This discussion is beneficial for anyone looking to optimize simulations in NextNano3 or understand the implications of contact types in nanostructures.

ingeni
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
hi there,

Im currently working with the program nextnano3. It's a really nice program with which you can simulate nanowires, dots etc.

I currently made a sample of an InP nanowire, with 3 sided gates at the bottom of the wire. These don't touch the wire (10nm between them and the wire) on which i can apply a voltage. The electric field coming of them let's me 'pull' wells in the cond- and valence bands. In these wells, electrons can get 'stuck'. Now I am changing the doping on the wire so that the fermi level and conductionband energy difference becomes smaller.
I actually want the fermi level to lie within the well. If this happens, it actually indicates that the electrons can get stuck in the well.

Now a question: the program let's met apply different kinds of boundary conditions. An ohmic contact or a shottky barrier. This means that the contact between the metal gates and the SiO2 (between the gate and the wire) is one of the contacts i mentioned above.
Now i would like to know what the difference is between these contacts, and if anyone knows which contacts are preferred for making a gated dot within the nanowire.
The program only let's me apply a voltage to ohmic contacts, but with shottky barriers i van also tell the program what the barrier height is.

Does anyone have any experience with this, and maybe explain to me the difference between and ohmic contact and a shottky barrier.

if it isn't clear, ill gladly explain some more.

thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
!The main difference between an ohmic contact and a Schottky barrier is that the Schottky barrier has a potential barrier height which must be overcome before electrons can flow through. This barrier height is determined by the work function of the metal used in the contact and the Fermi level of the semiconductor material. An ohmic contact, on the other hand, does not have an energy barrier and so electrons can flow through it easily. In terms of making a gated dot within a nanowire, an ohmic contact is generally preferred since it allows for an easier way to apply a voltage and control the conduction band energy levels. However, if you need to control the barrier height then a Schottky barrier may be better since you can adjust the work function of the metal contact to vary the barrier height.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K