MHB Nick's question at Yahoo Answers regarding a volume by slicing

  • Thread starter Thread starter MarkFL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Volume
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the volume of a solid with a triangular base defined by the line x + y = 9 and the axes, with semicircular cross sections perpendicular to the y-axis. The radius of the semicircle is derived from the x-coordinate, leading to the volume of an arbitrary slice expressed as dV = πr² dy. The total volume is computed using integration, resulting in V = (π/12)(9^3) = 243π/4. The solution involves substitution and the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus to evaluate the integral. The final volume of the solid is confirmed as 243π/4.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

Finding volume of a solid (calculus)?

Find the volume of the solid with the given base and cross sections.

The base is the triangle enclosed by x + y = 9,
the x-axis, and the y-axis. The cross sections perpendicular to the y-axis are semicircles.

Thanks in advance.

I have posted a link there to this thread so the OP can view my work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Nick,

For any slice of the solid made perpendicular to the $y$-axis, the diameter of the semi-circle is the $x$-coordinate on the line $x+y=9$, and so the radius is:

$$r=\frac{x}{2}=\frac{9-y}{2}$$

And so the volume of an arbitrary slice is:

$$dV=\pi r^2\,dy=\frac{\pi}{4}(9-y)^2\,dy$$

Hence, the summation of all the slices is given by:

$$V=\frac{\pi}{4}\int_0^9 (9-y)^2\,dy$$

Using the substitution:

$$u=9-y\,\therefore\,du=-dy$$ we obtain:

$$V=-\frac{\pi}{4}\int_9^0 u^2\,dy$$

Using the rule:

$$-\int_a^b f(x)\,dx=\int_b^a f(x)\,dx$$ we may write:

$$V=\frac{\pi}{4}\int_0^9 u^2\,dy$$

Applying the FTOC, we obtain:

$$V=\frac{\pi}{12}\left[u^3 \right]_0^9=\frac{9^3\pi}{12}=\frac{243\pi}{4}$$
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top