Nikola Tesla's Ideas - Autobiography Insight

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Nikola Tesla proposed the concept of harnessing power from the rotational energy of terrestrial bodies, suggesting that the Earth's diurnal rotation could be utilized to generate motive force. This idea, while innovative, has been met with skepticism, as many perceive it as overly abstract or "whacky." The discussion highlights the contrast between Tesla's visionary ideas and the practical applications of his inventions, such as the polyphase AC system, which remain significant today. Participants express concern over the romanticization of Tesla's legacy, attributing his modern fandom to the tragic circumstances of his later life.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Tesla's contributions to electrical engineering, particularly polyphase AC systems.
  • Familiarity with concepts of rotational energy and angular momentum.
  • Knowledge of historical context regarding technological advancements in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.
  • Awareness of the impact of public perception on scientific legacies.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of rotational energy and its potential applications in modern technology.
  • Explore the history and significance of polyphase AC systems in electrical engineering.
  • Investigate the societal and cultural factors influencing the perception of historical figures like Nikola Tesla.
  • Examine the role of media and popular culture in shaping the narratives around inventors and their ideas.
USEFUL FOR

Historians, electrical engineers, enthusiasts of scientific innovation, and anyone interested in the legacy of Nikola Tesla and the evolution of technology.

iVenky
Messages
212
Reaction score
12
Summary:: Based on his Autobiography

I was reading Nikola Tesla's ideas. He thought of deriving power from the rotational energy of terrestrial bodies. Are you aware of that? He says, " I had discovered that objects on the Earth's surface, owing to the diurnal rotation of the globe, are carried by the same alternately in and against the direction of translatory movement. From this results a great change in momentum which could be utilized in the simplest imaginable manner to furnish motive effort in any habitable region of the word." I don't get what he means:rolleyes:

source: google books
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
iVenky said:
Summary:: Based on his Autobiography

I don't get what he means
And neither do I. :wink:
There is a lot of energy available due to the ocean tides - which is the only thing he can mean but he is just using terms (just like a typical soothsayer or fortune teller) that can be interpreted any way we like looking back from his future.
Why do people take him so seriously? He had a lot of whacky ideas and a few working systems.That' a;;
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
iVenky said:
Summary:: Based on his Autobiography

He thought of deriving power from the rotational energy of terrestrial bodies. Are you aware of that?
I had the same idea long ago -- basically a large windmill-like structure to transfer angular momentum from the rotation of the Earth to the "windmill". I tilted at that idea for a little while, and then, well, you know... :wink:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hutchphd
In defense of Tesla I will provide my favorite quote from Linus Pauling (also an occasional purveyor of some whacky notions):

Q... Dr Pauling how is it that you have so many good ideas?
A... "Well I have a lot of ideas and I throw away the bad ones"

Hindsight is a little unfair to Tesla because of rapid adoption of the technology some of his ideas now seem to us so obviously whacky. Less so when they were put forward.
That being said Nicola Tesla was apparently a pretty strange dude.
But Sir Isaac apparently fits that mold also.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: iVenky and sophiecentaur
hutchphd said:
In defense of Tesla I will provide my favorite quote from Linus Pauling (also an occasional purveyor of some whacky notions):

Q... Dr Pauling how is it that you have so many good ideas?
A... "Well I have a lot of ideas and I throw away the bad ones"

Hindsight is a little unfair to Tesla because of rapid adoption of the technology some of his ideas now seem to us so obviously whacky. Less so when they were put forward.
That being said Nicola Tesla was apparently a pretty strange dude.
But Sir Isaac apparently fits that mold also.
You are right about hindsight and about the rapid advances of technology at his time. He was prepared to have a go with most of his ideas, unlike more 'sensible' contemporaries. He was spread too thin for the necessary 99% perspiration that's usually needed for success.
However, to be honest, my main problem is with his present day fans, rather than with him. Too many people mix up fact and Hollywood fiction, which has given his post mortem career a fantastic boost.

Newton was a lot more workmanlike, I think but, as with Tesla, it is his version of ideas that stays with us today.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Mondayman, DennisN and hutchphd
I was under the impression that the poly phase AC concept, and the motors and generators that go along with that, were Tesla inventions. Maybe that's not true, I don't know. But those were very important ideas that still are used world wide, and whoever came up with that stuff should be remembered for it. Much more important than the "wacky" Wardenclyff stuff.

I think Tesla's present day fandom is due in large part to the circumstances of his later life. Dying a penniless and forgotten genius is sure to attract fans. If he had died peacefully as a rich old man his crazy ideas wouldn't be remembered.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: iVenky, sophiecentaur and russ_watters
gmax137 said:
I think Tesla's present day fandom is due in large part to the circumstances of his later life. Dying a penniless and forgotten genius is sure to attract fans. If he had died peacefully as a rich old man his crazy ideas wouldn't be remembered.
Absolutely. Now he is a legend (furthermore, played by David Bowie in a film!) he will never die.
 
berkeman said:
I had the same idea long ago -- basically a large windmill-like structure to transfer angular momentum from the rotation of the Earth to the "windmill". I tilted at that idea for a little while, and then, well, you know... :wink:
I don't get, isn't the windmill moving with the earth? how are you transferring the angular mometum?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
11K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
11K