NMR - does rf cause transitions or simply rotate the magn vector?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the role of RF radiation in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR), specifically whether it causes transitions between spin states or merely rotates the magnetization vector. Participants clarify that while RF radiation can be viewed classically as causing precession at the Larmor frequency, quantum mechanically, it is absorbed by nuclei to induce state transitions. The conversation highlights the limitations of the classical vector model, especially for complex systems like quadrupolar nuclei, and suggests further exploration of David Hoult's work on RF absorption in NMR.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) principles
  • Familiarity with classical and quantum mechanics concepts
  • Knowledge of spin-1/2 nuclei behavior
  • Basic grasp of the Bloch sphere representation in NMR
NEXT STEPS
  • Research David Hoult's contributions to RF absorption in NMR
  • Study the differences between classical and quantum mechanical models of NMR
  • Explore the dynamics and relaxation studies of quadrupolar nuclei
  • Learn about the Bloch sphere and its application in NMR analysis
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, physicists, and students interested in advanced NMR techniques, particularly those working with complex nuclei and seeking to deepen their understanding of the underlying physics of RF interactions.

mrquantum
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Am I wrong in thinking that the rf radiation used in nmr is not "absorbed" by protons to cause transitions between spin states but rather it is only there to provide a magnetic field which can rotate the magnetisation vector away from the primary field?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
You can think that way. The issue is that the magnetization vector picture eventually loses the ability to really make sense of or devise the kinds of experiments people are interested in conducting.

One can get away with a fairly classical approach to magnetic resonance for spin-1/2 nuclei and imaging, to a large extent, but if, for example, one wants to work for my one former labmate - who does all kinds of stuff with quadrupolar nuclei in inorganic and biological solids, including dynamics and relaxation studies - just sticking with the vector model isn't going to cut it.

If you're interested in further reading, I'd suggest digging up the work of David Hoult on the nature of RF absorption and NMR over the last ~ 20 years. I can dig up the references, but I'll have to get back to you on that.
 
Last edited:
mrquantum, despite your name you have confused the quantum mechanical and classical pictures of NMR. Quantum mechanically a photon is indeed absorbed by the nucleus, which makes a transition between states. In the classical view, RF radiation causes the spin to precess at the Larmor frequency about the direction of the static magnetic field such that its polar angle changes. Both views are correct within their model universes.
 
I don't understand how both can be correct. Is the RF radiation absorbed and re-emitted or does it pass straight through the sample.

I'm basically trying to understand how the magnetisation vector (along +z) gets tipped into the xy-plane, or, if you like, how the z component of each nuclei's spin angular momentum is transferred into spin angular momentum in the x and y directions.

What am I misunderstanding? Does anybody know any good articles that will elucidate the difference between the quantum mechanical and classical approaches to NMR?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
6K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
6K