No Child Left Behind - the military connection

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Ivan Seeking
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Connection Military
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the implications of the No Child Left Behind Act regarding military recruitment access to student information. Participants explore concerns about privacy, the ethical considerations of such policies, and comparisons to other legislative actions.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • One participant highlights the requirement for local educational agencies to provide military recruiters access to student information, expressing concern over privacy and the need for parental consent.
  • Another participant dismisses the issue as "old news," suggesting it is not a significant concern compared to other legislative matters.
  • A different participant argues that there are more pressing legislative issues, referencing a bill that they believe undermines the First Amendment, implying that the focus on the No Child Left Behind Act is misplaced.
  • Another comment reiterates the previous point about the military's recruitment strategies, mentioning the use of financial incentives to attract young recruits and suggesting that the No Child Left Behind Act serves as a resource for recruitment.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the significance of the No Child Left Behind Act's provisions regarding military recruitment. While some express concern over privacy implications, others downplay the issue, indicating a lack of consensus on its importance.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various legislative actions and their implications, but the discussion does not resolve the ethical considerations or the effectiveness of the No Child Left Behind Act in relation to military recruitment.

Ivan Seeking
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
8,252
Reaction score
2,664
(1) ACCESS TO STUDENT RECRUITING INFORMATION- Notwithstanding section 444(a)(5)(B) of the General Education Provisions Act and except as provided in paragraph (2), each local educational agency receiving assistance under this Act shall provide, on a request made by military recruiters or an institution of higher education, access to secondary school students names, addresses, and telephone listings.

(2) CONSENT- A secondary school student or the parent of the student may request that the student's name, address, and telephone listing described in paragraph (1) not be released without prior written parental consent, and the local educational agency or private school shall notify parents of the option to make a request and shall comply with any request.

(3) SAME ACCESS TO STUDENTS- Each local educational agency receiving assistance under this Act shall provide military recruiters the same access to secondary school students as is provided generally to post secondary educational institutions or to prospective employers of those students.
http://www.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/pg112.html

Of course a parent would have to know about this before requesting that their private information be protected. To me this wreaks of sleeze. The default should be to protect privacy; especially when it comes to children.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yep, old news.
 
I wouldn't worry too much. This isn't nearly as damaging as some of the other scatology being legislated this week.

For instance, you probably didn't even notice the passage of H.R. 2679:
With little public attention or even notice, the House of Representatives has passed a bill that undermines enforcement of the First Amendment's separation of church and state...
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/29/AR2006092901055.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The military has been making their recruting quotas lately by offering large sign up bonuses for anyone who enlists in a combat MOS. The military gets enough 18 year old kids who can't resist the thought of enough money to buy a new car, to keep the cannon fodder bin full.:frown:

The requirements of the No Child Left Behind Act is still a primary source for finding young people though.

Most of the legislation passed by the Bush administration has had a lot of fine print.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 274 ·
10
Replies
274
Views
50K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
11K