Progress in Afghanistan: What's Next After 6 Years of War?

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Astronuc
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the complex situation in Afghanistan after six years of war, highlighting the need for a strategic plan to secure democracy and stability as outlined by Australia's Minister for Defense, Joel Fitzgibbon. Significant progress has been made, including an 8% economic growth rate, improved healthcare access for over 80% of the population, and the highest enrollment of Afghan children in education. However, challenges remain, particularly in the border regions with Iran and Pakistan, and the need for coherent strategies among ISAF partners is critical for future success.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of ISAF (International Security Assistance Force) operations
  • Familiarity with Afghanistan's socio-political landscape
  • Knowledge of NATO's strategic frameworks and limitations
  • Awareness of the historical context of U.S. involvement in Afghanistan
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the latest NATO strategic documents regarding Afghanistan
  • Examine the impact of U.S. foreign policy on regional stability in South Asia
  • Study the role of non-governmental organizations in Afghanistan's reconstruction
  • Analyze the effects of economic growth on Afghan society and governance
USEFUL FOR

Policy analysts, military strategists, humanitarian workers, and anyone interested in understanding the ongoing challenges and developments in Afghanistan's post-war environment.

  • #271
the US military doesn't use those tactics anymore. We don't simply blow up houses indiscriminately. There's a hearts and minds strategy being used, and it's working a lot better.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #272
SHISHKABOB said:
the US military doesn't use those tactics anymore. We don't simply blow up houses indiscriminately. There's a hearts and minds strategy being used, and it's working a lot better.

It need not, just showing their anti-Islamic attitude like for example burning their holy book are enough to lose local support and without support from civilians or ordinary people of Afghanistan (who are almost all muslims),they can't win.
 
  • #273
shashankac655 said:
It need not, just showing their anti-Islamic attitude like for example burning their holy book are enough to lose local support and without support from civilians or ordinary people of Afghanistan (who are almost all muslims),they can't win.

the anti-islamic attitudes are held by individuals within the US military. I highly doubt that anti-islamic attitudes are written out in the training of soldiers, etc. in the US military.
 
  • #274
rootX said:
Telling him no implies losing 10 years of war in Afghanistan. I agree with Karzai, people who burned Koran should be put to trail to bring peace in Afghanistan. Letting them go free would harm U.S. interests, given U.S. wants the support of local people.
Those 'people' are US military officers. The goal of the US is not to simply to bring peace to Afghanistan! The Taliban brought peace to Afghanistan prior to 2001 by lopping off the hands and heads of those who failed to grow a proper beard. If that was the only concern the country could be carpet bombed and starved into submission. Peace along with some form of pluralistic government and rule of law, not the street mob, is the US goal.
 
  • #275
Thread closed pending moderation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
10K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
8K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
7K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
6K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K