No same factor theory inference by hey.like

  • Thread starter Thread starter hey.like
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theory
Click For Summary
The discussion presents a mathematical assertion regarding natural numbers N, stating that for ranges from N/3, N/5, and N/7, if N is not divisible by these numbers, there exists at least one different prime factor between every two odd numbers in those ranges. This claim is linked to Goldbach's conjecture and suggests a relationship with the "no same factor theory." The argument implies that the absence of common factors among certain primes supports the conjecture. However, the clarity and validity of the reasoning are questioned, indicating confusion about the logic presented. Overall, the discussion highlights a complex interpretation of prime factors in relation to established mathematical conjectures.
hey.like
Messages
68
Reaction score
0

As natural number N,
from N/3 to N, if N is not divide exactly by 3, there are at least one different prime number factor between every both odd number;
from N/5 to N, if N is not divide exactly by 5,except for factor 3, there are at least one different prime number factor between every both odd number;
from N/7 to N, if N is not divide exactly by 7, except for factor 3,5, there are at least one different prime number factor between every both odd number;
... .

 
Physics news on Phys.org
This rusult follow as the Goldbach's conjecture prove by hey.like

To follow Goldbach's conjecture. this result is good with no same factor theory.

:wink: :smile: :wink:
 
That makes abslotuely no sense what so ever, but I suspect you know that.
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
615
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K