Nobel Prize 2023: Attosecond pulses

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter DrClaude
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nobel prize Physics
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the significance of the 2023 Nobel Prize in Physics awarded for the development of experimental methods that generate attosecond pulses of light. Participants explore the implications of this technology for studying electron dynamics in matter, including its potential applications and the broader impact on the field of physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express curiosity about the importance of attosecond pulse technology and its implications for probing fast-moving particles like electrons.
  • One participant notes that these tools have been available for about a decade and have been used to study electron dynamics in various systems.
  • Another participant reflects on their personal perception of the significance of this year's prize compared to previous years, suggesting that personal interests can influence the perceived importance of scientific advancements.
  • A participant questions whether the recognition of this work with a Nobel Prize is justified, suggesting it may be a fleeting trend.
  • There is a mention of a specific reference to a review article on attosecond physics, indicating ongoing scholarly interest in the topic.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the overall importance of the Nobel Prize awarded this year, with some expressing enthusiasm and others skepticism regarding its significance.

Contextual Notes

Some participants indicate uncertainty about the broader implications of the technology and its applications, suggesting that the discussion is still evolving and lacks definitive conclusions.

Physics news on Phys.org
Can anyone familiar with this field/technique give us an idea of how important this is?
 
Haborix said:
Can anyone familiar with this field/technique give us an idea of how important this is?
The presentation provided a few potential applications.

from 29.57
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Haborix
DrClaude said:
They rang Anne L’Huillier to tell her she had won but she was lecturing so they had to try a few times.

When they did get her, they told her but it was only a short call as she wanted to finished her lecture!

I wonder if she told her class?

Amazing.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
Haborix said:
Can anyone familiar with this field/technique give us an idea of how important this is?
Important enough to be worth a Nobel prize :-p

To be able to probe things that move very fast, like electrons in molecules, one needs very short bursts of light to interrogate systems. These tools have now been available for about a decade and have been used to study electron dynamics in atoms, molecules and non-structures.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman, Haborix and pinball1970
DrClaude said:
Important enough to be worth a Nobel prize :-p

To be able to probe things that move very fast, like electrons in molecules, one needs very short bursts of light to interrogate systems. These tools have now been available for about a decade and have been used to study electron dynamics in atoms, molecules and non-structures.
Yes, the trouble I have is my own personal interests means some years seem obviously important/cool and others just don’t trigger the same response. This year is the latter, but like you say, it is important enough to get a Nobel Prize, so I’m trying to figure out what I’m missing. Had the same response to the blue LEDs a few years ago.
 
pinball1970 said:
I wonder if she told her class?
I don't think you are allowed to say anything until the prize has been officially announced.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970
Haborix said:
Can anyone familiar with this field/technique give us an idea of how important this is?

I think it is a just a (very short) flash in the pan.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DaveE, BillTre and pinball1970

Similar threads

  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
14K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
9K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
8K