A Noether and the derivative of the Action

nemuritai
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I know that the Action has units Energy·time or Momentum·position. A second fact is that the derivative of the action with respect to time is Energy and similar with momentum-position, consistent with a units ie. dimensions check.Is it a coincidence that both are Noether conserved quantities? For example will the derivative of the Action with respect to phase be electric charge?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Angular momentum is a conserved quantity, but action is not though the both has same dimension.
 
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50, vanhees71 and nemuritai
:welcome:

nemuritai said:
I know that the Action has units Energy·time or Momentum·position. A second fact is that the derivative of the action with respect to time is Energy and similar with momentum-position, consistent with a units ie. dimensions check. Is it a coincidence that both are Noether conserved quantities?
If the Lagrangian is independent of time then energy is conserved. And, if it is indepenent of a spatial coordinate, then momentum in that direction is conserved. I don't see that as a coincidence.
nemuritai said:
For example will the derivative of the Action with respect to phase be electric charge?
I don't understand this question.
 
  • Like
Likes nemuritai and vanhees71
It's of course not a coincidence, because if the Lagrangian doesn't depend on some coordinate ##q## (but only its generalized velocity ##\dot{q}##), then the canonical momentum is conserved for the solutions of the equation of motion, i.e., it is a conserved quantity:
$$p_q=\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q}} \; \Rightarrow \; \dot{p}_q = \frac{\partial L}{\partial q}=0.$$
This canonical momentum is the generator of a symmetry (Noether's theorem).
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top