MHB Noetherian Rings - Dummit and Foote - Chapter 15

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rings
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around proving the converse of Hilbert's Basis Theorem, specifically that if the polynomial ring R[x] is Noetherian, then the ring R must also be Noetherian. A key point made is the existence of a canonical homomorphism from R[x] to R, where the polynomial X maps to zero. It is noted that Noetherianity is preserved under factoring, which leads to the conclusion that if R[x] is Noetherian, then the quotient ring R[x]/(X) is also Noetherian. This quotient ring is isomorphic to R, thereby establishing that R is Noetherian. The discussion provides a clear pathway to the proof required for the exercise.
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
Dummit and Foote Exercise 1 on page 668 states the following:

"Prove the converse to Hilbert's Basis Theorem: if the polynomial ring R[x] is Noetherian then R is Noetherian"

Can someone please help me get started on this exercise.

Peter

[Note: This has also been posted on MHF]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
(This is an old question, so I'll be posting a full answer instead of just hints)

Note that there is a canonical homomorphism $R[X] \to R$ given by $X \mapsto 0$. As Noetherianity is preserved by factoring, if $R[X]$ is Noetherian, then so is $R[X]/(X)$; and the latter is, as per the homomorphism, isomorphic to $R$. $\blacksquare$
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K