Noise modeling with Markov modeling

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on modeling noise using a first-order Markov process to replace GPS with accelerometer and horizontal gyroscope data. The user recorded measurements across all axes and computed auto-correlation, seeking to determine the value of "P" (correlation) in the context of a Kalman filter. It is established that noise is typically modeled as a stationary process rather than a Markov process, and the Gauss-Markov process is highlighted as a suitable alternative for achieving accurate results in this scenario.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of first-order Markov processes
  • Familiarity with Kalman filters
  • Knowledge of Gauss-Markov processes
  • Experience with accelerometer and gyroscope data analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical foundations of the Gauss-Markov process
  • Learn how to implement Kalman filters for sensor fusion
  • Explore techniques for estimating correlation in time series data
  • Investigate the properties of stationary processes in noise modeling
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for data scientists, engineers working with sensor data, and researchers interested in noise modeling and Kalman filtering techniques.

ramesses
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Hi
I'm using accelerometer & horizontal gyroscope in order to replace GPS. Now, I'want to model the noise with first order markov process, to use it in kalman filter.
I recorded measurement on all axes and computed auto-correlation.
This picture represents auto-correlation on one of axes.
http://picpaste.com/pics/autocorrelation_x-qjpnbYJk.1437477728.png

Now, I know that the first order markov process takes the following equation :
w = white noise which has the same variance.
and P is the correlation

My problem is how to fix the value of "P" (know as correlation) ?
thank you
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Noise is usually modeled as a stationary process, not a Markov process.
 
Gauss-Markov process ?
 
In general, a noise process has a mean of 0. A Markov process has a mean, at a given time, the value at the last known sample.
 
The Gauss-Markov process gives a good result as you see in this picture.
Now, I don't understand why I need to use kalman filter in-order to estimate the position's error ?
why we don't integrate directly the Gauss-Markov sequence ?
2A5Bmqzc2uO9.png
 
Sorry - Ican't answer your specific questions. I have not worked with the specific process or Kalman filters.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
22K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 152 ·
6
Replies
152
Views
11K