I have tried finding a table's length using two methods. Both should be applicable, as using a ruler implies uniform distribution, does it not? The first method involved calculating the mean length from a set of measurements, finding the variance, and substituting it in the formula for the total uncertainty, namely sqrt((variance/N) + (ruler's resolution)^2).(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

The second method involved using the formulae for uniform distribution to find the mean and deviation.

The results were different. I am 100% certain the first method is correct. But why would the uniform distribution formulae not be applicable in this case?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Non-applicability of uniform distribution formulae?

Loading...

Similar Threads - applicability uniform distribution | Date |
---|---|

B Strategy for a Lottery-Style Draw Application | Jan 12, 2018 |

I Selecting a Natural and a Real Uniformly at Random | Apr 16, 2017 |

Binomial Distribution for successive events | Nov 26, 2015 |

Application of sets with higher cardinality | May 7, 2015 |

Probability and its application | May 20, 2014 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**