Continuous uniform distribution - expected values

In summary: This works when ##f## is a linear function of ##X##. On the other hand consider the example of income tax where there are various "brackets" instead of a flat rate. Is the average tax paid by a citizen equal to the tax paid by a citizen who has the average income?
  • #1
thebosonbreaker
32
5
TL;DR Summary
If the area of a square is uniformly distributed over an interval, why is the expected value of the length different to the square root of the expected value of the square's area?
Hello,
I am currently stumped over a question that has to do with the continuous uniform distribution. The question was taken from a stats exam, and while I understand the solution given in the mark scheme, I don't understand why my way of thinking doesn't work.

The problem is:
The sides of a square are of length L cm and its area is A cm^2. Given that A is uniformly distributed on the interval [15, 20], find E(L).

The mark scheme solution uses integration [ by writing L = A^(1/2) ] so that E(L) = ∫(a^(1/2)) x (1/5)da between 15 and 20. I appreciate that this is making use of the fact that E[g(x)] = ∫g(x)f(x) dx for a CRV.

On the other hand, why can't we simply find E(A) and take its square root? If we expect the area to be E(A), is the length when it has this area not equal to the expected length?

If somebody could clarify this I would be very grateful for your help.

PS it just so happens in this case that both methods give you the same answer, but I know that my way is wrong and the mark scheme won't allow it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
thebosonbreaker said:
Summary: If the area of a square is uniformly distributed over an interval, why is the expected value of the length different to the square root of the expected value of the square's area?

Hello,
I am currently stumped over a question that has to do with the continuous uniform distribution. The question was taken from a stats exam, and while I understand the solution given in the mark scheme, I don't understand why my way of thinking doesn't work.

The problem is:
The sides of a square are of length L cm and its area is A cm^2. Given that A is uniformly distributed on the interval [15, 20], find E(L).

The mark scheme solution uses integration [ by writing L = A^(1/2) ] so that E(L) = ∫(a^(1/2)) x (1/5)da between 15 and 20. I appreciate that this is making use of the fact that E[g(x)] = ∫g(x)f(x) dx for a CRV.

On the other hand, why can't we simply find E(A) and take its square root? If we expect the area to be E(A), is the length when it has this area not equal to the expected length?

If somebody could clarify this I would be very grateful for your help.

PS it just so happens in this case that both methods give you the same answer, but I know that my way is wrong and the mark scheme won't allow it.

You could look at it the other way round. Suppose the length was uniformly distributed, would that give a uniformly distributed area?

To simplify things you could further consider a simple discrete case.

If the length is ##1, 2## or ##3## with equal probability, then the expected length is ##2##.

But, the area is ##1, 4## or ##9## with equal probability, giving an expected area of ##14/3##.
 
  • Like
Likes thebosonbreaker
  • #3
thebosonbreaker said:
PS it just so happens in this case that both methods give you the same answer, but I know that my way is wrong and the mark scheme won't allow it.

PS You may approximately get the same answer in this case , but it shouldn't be the same. From that point of view it's a poor question, as the two answers are nearly the same. This is because it's a relatively small interval relative to the starting point.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes thebosonbreaker
  • #4
thebosonbreaker said:
On the other hand, why can't we simply find E(A) and take its square root? If we expect the area to be E(A), is the length when it has this area not equal to the expected length?

It may help your intuition to state it as a generality.

If ##X## is a random variable with expected value ##\mu_X## and ##Y = f(X)## is a function of ##X## then your intuition is that the expected value of ##Y## should be ##f(\mu_X)##.

This works when ##f## is a linear function of ##X##. On the the other hand consider the example of income tax where there are various "brackets" instead of a flat rate. Is the average tax paid by a citizen equal to the tax paid by a citizen who has the average income?
 

1. What is a continuous uniform distribution?

A continuous uniform distribution is a probability distribution that describes the likelihood of a continuous random variable taking on any value within a specific range. It is characterized by a constant probability density function, meaning that all values within the range have an equal chance of occurring.

2. What is the expected value of a continuous uniform distribution?

The expected value, also known as the mean, of a continuous uniform distribution is the midpoint of the range. This can be calculated by taking the average of the minimum and maximum values in the range.

3. How is the expected value of a continuous uniform distribution different from other distributions?

The expected value of a continuous uniform distribution is unique in that it is always equal to the midpoint of the range. In other distributions, such as the normal distribution, the expected value may not necessarily fall at the center of the range.

4. How is the expected value used in real-world applications?

The expected value of a continuous uniform distribution is often used in decision-making processes, such as in finance and economics. It can also be used to calculate the average cost or value of a product or service.

5. Can the expected value of a continuous uniform distribution be negative?

No, the expected value of a continuous uniform distribution cannot be negative. This is because the range of values for a continuous uniform distribution must be positive, and the expected value is always equal to the midpoint of this range.

Similar threads

Replies
0
Views
264
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
1
Views
791
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
3
Views
818
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
1
Views
917
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
5
Views
865
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
25
Views
2K
Back
Top