1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Non-constant Current Density of Magnetic Field

  1. Apr 18, 2015 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    Screen shot 2015-04-17 at 11.51.51 PM.png

    2. Relevant equations
    Ienclosed = ∫ JdA
    ∫B*ds = m0*I

    3. The attempt at a solution
    This is my take of finding
    when r is greater than R--so, the magnetic field is m0*I/2pir, since
    B(2pir) = m0*I
    This is because the amperian circle covers the whole wire.

    Can somebody verify that this is correct? (when r>R) I mean it doesnt matter that the density is nonunfirom correct?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Apr 18, 2015 #2
    Correct but still you got to calculate I which will not be the same as if the current density was uniform.
     
  4. Apr 18, 2015 #3
    Oh I understand that "I" will be different when r is INSIDE the circle. But "I" outside should just be "I" total without having to integrate right?
     
  5. Apr 18, 2015 #4
    For an amperian circular loop that has radius any r>R , the current I will be the same "I total", but how you gonna find it without integrating the current density? it will be

    [itex]I=\int\limits_{0}^{R}\int\limits_{0}^{2\pi}\vec{J}\cdot d\vec{S}[/itex]

    while for r<=R it will be
    [itex]I=\int\limits_{0}^{r}\int\limits_{0}^{2\pi}\vec{J}\cdot d\vec{S}[/itex]
     
    Last edited: Apr 18, 2015
  6. Apr 18, 2015 #5
    Well originally I integrated it from limits R to r (r>R) for J*dA....and got an answer of a current equaling to I(r^5-R^5)/(R^5). And so B equaled m0*I(r^5-R^5)/(2piR^5*r)...so then I realized integrating for the amper circle outside would not be reasonable.
     
  7. Apr 18, 2015 #6
    I mean sure finding r inside the circle is a different current, but my main concern is outside.
     
  8. Apr 18, 2015 #7
    Doing it at 0 to R is the complete wire. It doesn't relate to the r of the amp. circle that is outside it, right?
     
  9. Apr 18, 2015 #8
    You integrated current density from R to r??? But the current density is zero outside the wire isnt it?
    when the radius r is >R then you integrate from 0 to R cause the loop encloses the whole wire.
     
  10. Apr 18, 2015 #9
    Oh yeah you make a great point, I just thought back on the section of Gauss and remembered that. Thanks!
    But as I integrated from 0 to R...and plugged in the Jo for the current density...I got a result of just "I". (a good indication that it is correct).

    So it wouldnt really be necessary at all to integrate right?--I mean everything cancels in the end to get a final "Itot". Or is it safe to just integrate anyways?
     
  11. Apr 18, 2015 #10
    Well integrating from 0 to R i seem to get a total current [itex]I=\frac{2}{5}\pi J_0R[/itex]
     
  12. Apr 18, 2015 #11
    Yup same here--when you find j0 and Im sure you could--you get 5I/2PiR :)...it then equals to I haha
     
  13. Apr 18, 2015 #12
    I guess integrating is a good way to show it, and indeed you're correct about the integration, but it would seem a tad redundant in having to do that since I that is enc equals the current of the wire in its entirety.
     
  14. Apr 18, 2015 #13
    yes ok, it is just that the total current I is not given, instead you are given the current density equation, R and J_0.
     
  15. Apr 18, 2015 #14
    I appreciate your help Delta!
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted