Non-constant Current Density of Magnetic Field

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of magnetic fields in the context of non-constant current density, specifically when analyzing the magnetic field outside a cylindrical wire. Participants explore the implications of varying current density on the total current enclosed by an amperian loop.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of the total current I when the radius r is greater than R, questioning whether it is necessary to integrate the current density to find I. Some express confusion about the relevance of integrating current density outside the wire, while others attempt to clarify the integration limits.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights into the integration process and its implications for calculating the magnetic field. There is recognition of the redundancy in integrating when the total current can be derived directly, but no consensus on the necessity of integration has been reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the total current I is not explicitly given, but rather the current density equation, R, and J_0 are provided. This context influences the discussion on how to approach the problem.

Aristotle
Messages
169
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Screen shot 2015-04-17 at 11.51.51 PM.png


Homework Equations


Ienclosed = ∫ JdA
∫B*ds = m0*I

The Attempt at a Solution


This is my take of finding [/B]when r is greater than R--so, the magnetic field is m0*I/2pir, since
B(2pir) = m0*I
This is because the amperian circle covers the whole wire.

Can somebody verify that this is correct? (when r>R) I mean it doesn't matter that the density is nonunfirom correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Correct but still you got to calculate I which will not be the same as if the current density was uniform.
 
Delta² said:
Correct but still you got to calculate I which will not be the same as if the current density was uniform.

Oh I understand that "I" will be different when r is INSIDE the circle. But "I" outside should just be "I" total without having to integrate right?
 
For an amperian circular loop that has radius any r>R , the current I will be the same "I total", but how you going to find it without integrating the current density? it will be

[itex]I=\int\limits_{0}^{R}\int\limits_{0}^{2\pi}\vec{J}\cdot d\vec{S}[/itex]

while for r<=R it will be
[itex]I=\int\limits_{0}^{r}\int\limits_{0}^{2\pi}\vec{J}\cdot d\vec{S}[/itex]
 
Last edited:
Delta² said:
For an amperian circular loop that has radius any r>R , the current I will be the same "I total", but how you going to find it without integrating the current density?
Well originally I integrated it from limits R to r (r>R) for J*dA...and got an answer of a current equaling to I(r^5-R^5)/(R^5). And so B equaled m0*I(r^5-R^5)/(2piR^5*r)...so then I realized integrating for the amper circle outside would not be reasonable.
 
I mean sure finding r inside the circle is a different current, but my main concern is outside.
 
Delta² said:
For an amperian circular loop that has radius any r>R , the current I will be the same "I total", but how you going to find it without integrating the current density? it will be

[itex]I=\int\limits_{0}^{R}\int\limits_{0}^{2\pi}\vec{J}\cdot d\vec{S}[/itex]
Doing it at 0 to R is the complete wire. It doesn't relate to the r of the amp. circle that is outside it, right?
 
Aristotle said:
Well originally I integrated it from limits R to r (r>R) for J*dA...and got an answer of a current equaling to I(r^5-R^5)/(R^5). And so B equaled m0*I(r^5-R^5)/(2piR^5*r)...so then I realized integrating for the amper circle outside would not be reasonable.
You integrated current density from R to r? But the current density is zero outside the wire isn't it?
Aristotle said:
Doing it at 0 to R is the complete wire. It doesn't relate to the r of the amp. circle that is outside it, right?
when the radius r is >R then you integrate from 0 to R cause the loop encloses the whole wire.
 
Delta² said:
You integrated current density from R to r? But the current density is zero outside the wire isn't it?

when the radius r is >R then you integrate from 0 to R cause the loop encloses the whole wire.
Oh yeah you make a great point, I just thought back on the section of Gauss and remembered that. Thanks!
But as I integrated from 0 to R...and plugged in the Jo for the current density...I got a result of just "I". (a good indication that it is correct).

So it wouldn't really be necessary at all to integrate right?--I mean everything cancels in the end to get a final "Itot". Or is it safe to just integrate anyways?
 
  • #10
Well integrating from 0 to R i seem to get a total current [itex]I=\frac{2}{5}\pi J_0R[/itex]
 
  • #11
Delta² said:
Well integrating from 0 to R i seem to get a total current [itex]I=\frac{2}{5}\pi J_0R[/itex]

Yup same here--when you find j0 and I am sure you could--you get 5I/2PiR :)...it then equals to I haha
 
  • #12
I guess integrating is a good way to show it, and indeed you're correct about the integration, but it would seem a tad redundant in having to do that since I that is enc equals the current of the wire in its entirety.
 
  • #13
yes ok, it is just that the total current I is not given, instead you are given the current density equation, R and J_0.
 
  • #14
Delta² said:
yes ok, it is just that the total current I is not given, instead you are given the current density equation, R and J_0.
I appreciate your help Delta!
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K