Non Decreasing Subsequence in [0,1]

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Bachelier
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    decreasing Subsequence
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the Bolzano-Weierstrass property in the context of sequences within the interval [0,1]. Participants explore the construction of a sequence that converges to any point in [0,1], focusing on the properties of density and specific examples of sequences.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant references a question from an analysis book regarding the existence of a sequence in [0,1] that converges to any point in that interval.
  • Another participant suggests using a sequence that enumerates all rational numbers as a potential solution.
  • A third participant proposes the Farey sequence as a specific example of such a sequence.
  • It is noted that a sequence must be dense in [0,1] to satisfy the convergence requirement, with an example of a formula for generating dyadic numbers provided as a dense subset.
  • A participant expresses gratitude for the clarifications offered in the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the necessity of density in the sequence but propose different examples and methods for constructing such sequences. No consensus is reached on a singular approach.

Contextual Notes

The discussion does not resolve the specific properties or implications of the proposed sequences, and assumptions about density and convergence are not fully explored.

Bachelier
Messages
375
Reaction score
0
Not a homework problem.

I was reading this analysis book by Korner and in it there was a question about Bolzano-Weierstrass property in [tex]\mathbb{R}[/tex]. it states

[tex]\text{Find a sequence} \ x_n \in [0,1], \text{such that given any x} \in [0,1], \text{we can find} \ n_1 < n_2 < ... s.t. \ x_n_j \rightarrow x \ as j \rightarrow \infty[/tex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try to take a sequence that enumerates all the rational numbers. I believe that could do it...
 
you mean something like the Farey sequence.
 
Basically it is sufficient that your sequence as a set is dense in [0,1] (this is not immediately obvious, but apparent if you think of it, since any open interval around x will contain an infinite amount of elements). A sequence ordering the rationals will certainly do, but a simple explicit formula could be [tex]y(n,k) = k/2^n[/tex] where k ranges from 0 to 2^n for each n, and letting [tex]x_{n} = x(\lfloor \log_2n \rfloor,n-2^{\lfloor \log_2n \rfloor})[/tex]. What has been done is just forming y(n,k) into a sequence.

This will generate the set of dyadic numbers in [0,1] which is a dense subset.
 
Last edited:
Clear...Thank you guys. :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K