Non Decreasing Subsequence in [0,1]

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Bachelier
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    decreasing Subsequence
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 2K views
Bachelier
Messages
375
Reaction score
0
Not a homework problem.

I was reading this analysis book by Korner and in it there was a question about Bolzano-Weierstrass property in [tex]\mathbb{R}[/tex]. it states

[tex]\text{Find a sequence} \ x_n \in [0,1], \text{such that given any x} \in [0,1], \text{we can find} \ n_1 < n_2 < ... s.t. \ x_n_j \rightarrow x \ as j \rightarrow \infty[/tex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
you mean something like the Farey sequence.
 
Basically it is sufficient that your sequence as a set is dense in [0,1] (this is not immediately obvious, but apparent if you think of it, since any open interval around x will contain an infinite amount of elements). A sequence ordering the rationals will certainly do, but a simple explicit formula could be [tex]y(n,k) = k/2^n[/tex] where k ranges from 0 to 2^n for each n, and letting [tex]x_{n} = x(\lfloor \log_2n \rfloor,n-2^{\lfloor \log_2n \rfloor})[/tex]. What has been done is just forming y(n,k) into a sequence.

This will generate the set of dyadic numbers in [0,1] which is a dense subset.
 
Last edited:
Clear...Thank you guys. :smile: