Non-destructive testing - Porosity

  • Thread starter Thread starter Marbig
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    porosity Testing
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on non-destructive testing (NDT) methods for assessing porosity in a bearing pad that failed a porosity test. Key testing methods mentioned include penetrant testing, radiography, eddy current testing, and helium/gas pycnometry. The participants emphasize that penetrant testing is suitable for surface or open porosity, while radiography can identify voids but requires calibration with known standards. The conversation concludes with a recommendation to explore various NDT methods for accurate assessment and repair decisions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of non-destructive testing (NDT) principles
  • Familiarity with penetrant testing techniques
  • Knowledge of radiography and its calibration requirements
  • Basic concepts of eddy current testing and its applications
NEXT STEPS
  • Research helium/gas pycnometry for porosity measurement
  • Learn about the calibration standards for radiography in NDT
  • Explore the limitations and applications of eddy current testing
  • Investigate ultrasonic testing (UT) methods for porosity detection
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, quality control specialists, and technicians involved in material testing and repair processes, particularly those focused on non-destructive testing methods for assessing porosity in industrial components.

Marbig
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

We have a bearing pad at work that failed a porosity test and could not hold pressure (this was the pad itself and not the babbit surface).

I need to look into some NDT testing that will give us an idea about the porosity. I have googled and some sites say different things, from what I gather it will be penetrate testing, radiography or eddy current.

Basically I need a test that will allow me to say to someone that this pad needs to be repaired so that "XXX test" reveals that surface defects are less than "xxx (some sort of classification that corresponds to the test method)" so that it will past its porosity test.

This will be more specific than simply saying that the pad needs to be repaired so that the porosity test will be passed.

I would be interested in hearing your opinions. Thanks for all your help.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Penetrant testing only works for surface or open porosity, i.e. porosity connected to the surface.

Radiography might work depending on the type of porosity. Radiography usually looks for voids, but density (1 - porosity) would require calibration (with standards of know porosity/density).

Eddy-current may not work - it is usually used for surface flaws (voids) - and it also would require calibration.

Depending on the size, helium/gas pycnometry might work.

UT might also work.

Look here for some ideas.
http://www.ndt-ed.org/GeneralResources/MethodSummary/MethodSummary.htm
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K