Non linear differential equation

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a non-linear differential equation derived from the G_theta theta component of the Einstein tensor while working with the Schwarzschild metric and a non-zero cosmological constant. The equation presented is e^2a(d^2a + 2(da)^2 + 2/r(da)) = L, where L represents the cosmological constant and r is the radial coordinate. The user expresses difficulty in finding a solution by inspection due to the equation's complexity and non-linearity. They seek assistance in solving this equation, acknowledging the potential for calculation errors. The conversation highlights the challenges of dealing with non-linear differential equations in general relativity contexts.
Terilien
Messages
140
Reaction score
0
I can't type in latex so in this post d^2a is the secpnd derivative of a, while (da)^2 is the square of the derivative.

This equation arose from the G_thetatheta compinent of the einstein tensor. Iwas solving tfor the shcwarzchildmetric where where the cosmos constant is nonzero.

the equation is:

e^2a(d^2a +2(da)^2 +2/r(da))= L where L is the cosmological constantand r is the radial coordinate. Umm how do we solve this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Terilien said:
I can't type in latex so in this post d^2a is the secpnd derivative of a, while (da)^2 is the square of the derivative.

This equation arose from the G_thetatheta compinent of the einstein tensor. Iwas solving tfor the shcwarzchildmetric where where the cosmos constant is nonzero.

the equation is:

e^2a(d^2a +2(da)^2 +2/r(da))= L where L is the cosmological constantand r is the radial coordinate. Umm how do we solve this?

e^{2a}(da'' +2da^2 + \frac{2da}{r}) = L

is that right?
 
Last edited:
Yes it is. can you helpme?

essentially I determined from G_tt and G_rr that b=-a just like with the ordinary metric. When I plugged it into the G_thetathata equation, it was still fairly ugly, and icouldnt find a solution by inspection. Non linears are annoying.
 
Last edited:
Is it not

a^{\prime \prime} + 2 a^{\prime 2} + \frac{2a}{r} = L e^{-2a}

and, presumably the derivative is with respect to r, yes?
 
yes it is. It may be that. It is possible that I've made a small mistake in my calculations of miswrote someon paper. How do we solve that? Can it be done by inspection? non linearity scares me.

could someone help me solve it?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K