Non-linearly independent eigenvectors

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on finding a non-singular matrix P for the matrix B = [[1, 0], [6, -1]] such that P-1BP = D, where D is a diagonal matrix. The eigenvalues of B are determined to be λ = 1 and λ = -1. The participant initially struggles with non-linearly independent eigenvectors but resolves the confusion by recognizing that the eigenvector for λ = 1 is (1/3, 1) and for λ = -1 is (0, 1), clarifying that (1, 0) is not an eigenvector.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of eigenvalues and eigenvectors
  • Familiarity with diagonalization of matrices
  • Knowledge of triangular matrices
  • Proficiency in matrix operations, including matrix inversion
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the process of diagonalization in linear algebra
  • Learn about eigenvector linear independence and its implications
  • Explore the properties of triangular matrices and their eigenvalues
  • Investigate the use of the determinant in finding eigenvalues
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying linear algebra, as well as educators teaching concepts related to eigenvalues and matrix diagonalization.

derryck1234
Messages
55
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let B = 1 0
6 -1
Be a square matrix. Find a non-singular matrix P such that P-1BP = D, where D is a diagonal matrix and show that P-1BP = D.

Homework Equations



det(lambdaI - A) = 0

The Attempt at a Solution



Ok, this might look like a simple problem...but I get non-linearly independent eigenvectors, even although I have 2 distinct eigenvalues?

Noting that it is a triangular matrix, the diagonal entries thus correspond to its eigenvalues. So, the matrix has lambda = 1 and lambda = -1 as its eigenvalues.

For lambda = 1, I obtain the basis vector (1/3, 1).

For lambda = -1, I obtain the basis vectors (1, 0) and (0, 1)...

Thus, I have non-linearly independent eigenvectors, since (1/3, 1) can be written as 1/3(1, 0) + (0, 1)...

?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


i got only (0,1) and (1/3,1) as the eigenvectors. (1,0) isn't an eigenvector.
 


Ok. I see it now...flip, just needed some revising on finding solution spaces...I get the same answer now too...thanks...
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K