Operator T, ##T^2=I##, -1 not an eigenvalue of T, prove ##T=I##.

  • #1
zenterix
480
70
Homework Statement
Suppose ##T\in\mathcal{L}(V)## and ##T^2=I## and ##-1## is not an eigenvalue of ##T##. Prove that ##T=I##
Relevant Equations
Since ##T^2=I## then ##T_2-I=0## is the zero operator. Then ##(T+I)(T-I)=0##.
Now, for ##v\in V##, ##(T+I)v=0\implies Tv=-v##. That is, the null space of ##T+I## is formed by eigenvectors of ##T## of eigenvalue ##-1##.

By assumption, there are no such eigenvectors (since ##-1## is not an eigenvalue of ##T##).

Hence, if ##(T-I)v \neq 0## then ##(T+I)(T-I)v\neq 0##.

Thus, For ##(T+I)(T-I)=0## we need to have ##(T-I)v=0## for all ##v \in V##.

##(T-I)v=Tv-v=0\implies Tv=v##

Therefore, it must be that ##T=I##.

This is the solution I came up with.

For comparison, here is another solution. My solution differs from this solution, I just want to make sure my reasoning is correct since my proof seems simpler than the linked solution.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Your solution looks fine.
 
  • Like
Likes zenterix
  • #3
You can make it a bit shorter. If the null space of ##T+I## contains only the zero vector. This operator is invertable so ##(T+I)(T-I)=0## implies ##T-I=0##.
 
  • Like
Likes zenterix and PeroK

1. How do you prove that -1 is not an eigenvalue of T?

To prove that -1 is not an eigenvalue of T, we assume that there exists a non-zero vector v such that Tv = -v. This implies that T^2v = T(Tv) = T(-v) = -Tv = -(-v) = v. However, this contradicts the given condition that T^2 = I. Therefore, -1 cannot be an eigenvalue of T.

2. What does it mean for T to be equal to I?

For an operator T to be equal to I, it means that T is the identity operator. This implies that for any vector v, Tv = v. In other words, T leaves every vector unchanged.

3. How does the condition T^2 = I help in proving T = I?

The condition T^2 = I is crucial in proving T = I because it implies that T is its own inverse. This means that applying T twice is equivalent to the identity operator. By using this property, we can show that T must be equal to I.

4. What is the significance of proving T = I when -1 is not an eigenvalue of T?

Proving that T = I when -1 is not an eigenvalue of T is important because it shows that the operator T behaves like the identity operator in the absence of -1 as an eigenvalue. This result highlights the unique properties of T and its relationship to the identity operator.

5. Can you provide a step-by-step proof of T = I given the conditions mentioned?

Starting with the condition T^2 = I and the fact that -1 is not an eigenvalue of T, we can construct a step-by-step proof to show that T must be equal to I. By carefully analyzing the properties of T and using the given conditions, we can logically deduce that T is indeed the identity operator.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
528
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
24
Views
800
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
624
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
0
Views
451
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
461
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
527
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
610
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
131
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
416
Back
Top