Non-Normal Subgroups in Simple Groups

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter spamiam
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Groups
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the existence of non-normal subgroups within simple groups, exploring examples and theoretical implications. Participants examine specific cases, theorems, and the nature of subgroup normality in the context of simple groups.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that the alternating group for n > 4 is an example of a simple group with non-normal subgroups.
  • Another participant claims that all non-abelian simple groups have non-normal subgroups due to their even order, which implies the existence of elements of order 2 and thus subgroups of that order.
  • A question is raised regarding whether all non-abelian simple groups necessarily have even order or if this is merely an example.
  • Participants discuss the implications of Cauchy's theorem in relation to the existence of elements of order 2 and the nature of these subgroups being non-normal, particularly in the context of simple groups.
  • Specific examples of simple groups are requested, with mentions of \mathbb{Z}/p\mathbb{Z} and A_n for n > 4, as well as a reference to the monster group and its non-normal subgroup, the baby monster.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express uncertainty regarding the order of non-abelian simple groups and the reasoning behind the non-normality of certain subgroups. There is no consensus on the completeness of examples or the implications of theorems discussed.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference the Feit-Thompson theorem and Cauchy's theorem, but the discussion does not resolve the implications of these theorems on the nature of non-normal subgroups in simple groups.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in group theory, particularly those studying simple groups and subgroup properties, may find this discussion relevant.

spamiam
Messages
360
Reaction score
1
What are some simple groups that have non-normal subgroups? The only example I can think of is the alternating group for n > 4.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
all non abelian simple groups have non normal subgroups. i.e. they have even order, so they have elements of order 2, hence subgroups of order 2, which are necessarily non normal.
 
Thanks for your reply, mathwonk!

mathwonk said:
all non abelian simple groups have non normal subgroups. i.e. they have even order...

Wait, all non-abelian simple groups have even order? Or did you mean that as an example?

...so they have elements of order 2, hence subgroups of order 2, which are necessarily non normal.

Okay, the element of order 2 follows from Cauchy's theorem, but why are these subgroups "necessarily" non-normal? Is it just because we were already assuming the group was simple or is there a deeper reason?

I was kind of hoping for some specific examples of known groups. The only examples of simple groups with which I'm familiar are [itex]\mathbb{Z}/p\mathbb{Z}[/itex] and [itex]A_n[/itex] for n > 4. Are there any other well-known ones?

Thanks again!
 
spamiam said:
Wait, all non-abelian simple groups have even order? Or did you mean that as an example?

Yes, a finite simple group is either [tex]\mathbb{Z}_p[/tex] or have even order. This is the contents of the celebrated Feit-Thompson theorem.

Okay, the element of order 2 follows from Cauchy's theorem, but why are these subgroups "necessarily" non-normal? Is it just because we were already assuming the group was simple or is there a deeper reason?

That is correct. The subgroup is non-normal, because we assumed that the group was simple.

I was kind of hoping for some specific examples of known groups. The only examples of simple groups with which I'm familiar are [itex]\mathbb{Z}/p\mathbb{Z}[/itex] and [itex]A_n[/itex] for n > 4. Are there any other well-known ones?

Thanks again!

To my knowledge, example of simple groups are kind of tricky. The article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_finite_simple_groups gives a list of simple groups. The most intriguing of these groups is the so-called monster group, which is very big. It contains a (non-normal of course) subgroup which is also huge and is called the baby monster.
 
micromass said:
This is the contents of the celebrated Feit-Thompson theorem.

Celebrated, eh? Looks like I might have to go celebrate with a textbook. :biggrin:

To my knowledge, example of simple groups are kind of tricky. The article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_finite_simple_groups gives a list of simple groups.

You weren't kidding! I could understand the construction of about 3 families out of that list. Thanks for the link!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K